Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep 5;45(5):652-665.
doi: 10.11607/prd.7127.

Computer-Assisted Implant Planning: A Review of Data Registration Techniques

Review

Computer-Assisted Implant Planning: A Review of Data Registration Techniques

Ignacio Pedrinaci et al. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. .

Abstract

Computer-assisted implant planning allows for a comprehensive treatment plan by combining radiographic data provided by CBCT with surface optical scan data that includes the patient's intraoral situation and the intended restorative planning. Integrating a tailored restorative de-sign with the patient's anatomical conditions through virtual implant planning allows for an ideal biorestorative treatment planning that maximizes biologic, functional, and esthetic outcomes. This article discusses dataset registration techniques that combine radiographic CBCT data with re-storative information as the main path to create a virtual patient. The described techniques include the use of removable radiographic templates with radiopaque markers, the dual scan technique, and direct digital file registration of intraoral scans using anatomical references. Depending on the individual clinical situation, different factors must be considered to appropriately select methods that achieve an optimal registration of diverse datasets. An inherent challenge lies in the presence of scattering artifacts in CBCT scans. Two approaches are proposed for these situations: the use of chairside-fabricated composite resin markers or adhesive spot-markers fabricated for use with computed tomography scans. Both techniques exhibit limitations that must be considered. Further approaches should be developed for situations involving scattering in CBCT scans.

Keywords: : computer-assisted surgery; data superimposition; digital imaging processing; digital workflow; dual tech-nique; scattering.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances