Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Sep 12;64(3):2400512.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00512-2024. Print 2024 Sep.

Benralizumab for allergic asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Benralizumab for allergic asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Gail M Gauvreau et al. Eur Respir J. .

Abstract

Background: Benralizumab induces rapid and near-complete depletion of eosinophils from blood and lung tissue. We investigated whether benralizumab could attenuate the allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR) in participants with allergic asthma.

Methods: Participants with allergic asthma who demonstrated increased sputum eosinophils and LAR at screening were randomised to benralizumab 30 mg or matched placebo given every 4 weeks for 8 weeks (3 doses). Allergen challenges were performed at weeks 9 and 12 when blood, sputum, bone marrow and bronchial tissue eosinophils and LAR were assessed.

Results: 46 participants (mean age 30.9 years) were randomised to benralizumab (n=23) or placebo (n=23). Eosinophils were significantly reduced in the benralizumab group compared with placebo in blood at 4 weeks and sputum and bone marrow at 9 weeks after treatment initiation. At 7 h after an allergen challenge at week 9, sputum eosinophilia was significantly attenuated in the benralizumab group compared to placebo (least squares mean difference -5.81%, 95% CI -10.69- -0.94%; p=0.021); however, the LAR was not significantly different (least squares mean difference 2.54%, 95% CI 3.05-8.12%; p=0.363). Adverse events were reported for seven (30.4%) and 14 (60.9%) participants in the benralizumab and placebo groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Benralizumab administration over 8 weeks resulted in a significant attenuation of blood, bone marrow and sputum eosinophilia in participants with mild allergic asthma; however, there was no change in the LAR, suggesting that eosinophils alone are not a key component of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: G.M. Gauvreau reports support for the present manuscript from AstraZeneca, grants from AstraZeneca, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from AstraZeneca. R. Sehmi reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca. R. Leigh reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca. D.W. Cockcroft reports support for the present manuscript from AstraZeneca, and grants from SHRF, Biohaven, AllerGen, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine and CIHR. I. Mayers reports grants from AstraZeneca Canada and Boehringer Ingelheim, consultancy fees from Sanofi Canada and AstraZeneca, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, and payment for expert testimony from Alberta Justice. L-P. Boulet reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi-Regeneron, royalties or licences from UptoDate and Taylor & Francis, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Sanofi-Regeneron, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck and Sanofi, and leadership role as Past-Chair of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Board of Directors, Past President of the Global Asthma Organisation (Interasma), Past Member of the Canadian Thoracic Society Respiratory Guidelines Committee and Past Laval University Chair on Knowledge Transfer, Prevention and Education in Respiratory and Cardiovascular Health. T. Ho reports grants from Fisher & Paykel, consultancy fees from Valeo and AstraZeneca, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. I. Satia reports grants from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Bellus, consultancy fees from Merck, Genentech, Respiplus and GlaxoSmithKline/Bellus, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Sanofi. P.D. Mitchell reports grants from Teva, consultancy fees from Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, and support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca. I.P. Magee reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from GlaxoSmithKline. C. Bergeron reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca, grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Regeneron, consultancy fees from ValeoPharma, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, ValeoPharma, Sanofi and Grifols. M. Bhutani reports grants from CIHR, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Sanofi, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Covis and Valeo, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Covis. V. Werkström was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. T. Durżyński was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. K. Shoemaker was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. R.K. Katial was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports personal fees from AstraZeneca. M. Jison was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. C. McCrae was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. P.M. O'Byrne reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca, grants from AstraZeneca, Merck and Biohaven, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sage, Teva and Affibody, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Covis. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study schematic. FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (pre-bronchodilator); MCh: methacholine (assessment for airway hyperresponsiveness). #: primary end-point assessment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effect of benralizumab on a) sputum eosinophils and b) change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) during the week 9 allergen challenge. Data are presented as mean±sd. Shaded values are co-primary end-points. Analyses are based on the primary efficacy analysis set that excluded one patient in the placebo group who received a higher dose of allergen at week 9 than in the screening challenge. Tabular results are based on repeated-measures analyses that estimated the mean change from before to after allergen exposure in the benralizumab group compared with the placebo group. The model for the sputum eosinophils percentage estimates was: allergen-induced change = treatment group +time post-allergen challenge + treatment group × time post-allergen challenge + allergen-induced change at screening. The model for the maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 estimates was: maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 in airway response = treatment group + maximum percentage decrease in airway response at screening. LS: least squares; AUC: area under the curve; EAR0–2 h: early asthmatic response (hours 0–2); LAR3–7 h: late asthmatic response (hours 3–7).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Effect of benralizumab versus placebo on eosinophil levels measured before and after allergen challenge in a) blood, b) bone marrow, c) sputum and d) bronchial submucosa. Data are presented as mean±sd based on the full analysis set. Blood eosinophils were measured using the Advia 2120i system, bone marrow eosinophils from smears stained with DiffQuik and haemocytometer total leukocyte count, sputum eosinophils stained with DiffQuik on a cytospin and expressed as a percentage of leukocytes, and endobronchial eosinophils measured in haematoxylin/eosin-stained submucosa. *: p<0.05; #: p<0.0001 based on t-tests between means of treatment groups at each visit. Comparisons of between-group changes in eosinophils are presented in supplementary table E2.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Effect of benralizumab versus placebo on basophil levels measured before and after allergen challenge in a) blood, b) bone marrow, c) sputum and d) bronchial submucosa. Data are presented as mean±sd based on the full analysis set. Blood, bone marrow and sputum basophils were measured by flow cytometry, taken as an average of CD45+FcεRI+CD123+, CD45+FcεRI+CRTH2+ or CD45+FcεRI+CCR3+; endobronchial basophils were measured using 2D7 antibody and immunofluorescence microscopy. *: p<0.05; #: p<0.0001 based on t-tests between means of treatment groups at each visit. In ANCOVA analyses performed to compare between-group changes in basophils from week 0 to 9 (24 h post-challenge), the least squares (LS) mean difference for benralizumab versus placebo was −26.9 (95% CI −37.2–16.5) cells·µL−1 (p<0.0001) in blood (n=17 versus 20), −39.1 (95% CI −64.5– −13.7) cells·µL−1 (p=0.005) in bone marrow (n=11 versus 10) and −0.29 (95% CI −0.77–0.19) cells·µg−1 (p=0.231) in sputum (n=18 versus 19). In the ANCOVA analysis for bronchial submucosa comparing changes from baseline to week 8, the LS mean difference for benralizumab (n=18) versus placebo (n=17) was −1.5 (95% CI −6.1–3.2) cells·mm−2 (p=0.522).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) . Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. 2022. Available from: http://goldcopd.org/
    1. Pakkasela J, Ilmarinen P, Honkamaki J, et al. . Age-specific incidence of allergic and non-allergic asthma. BMC Pulm Med 2020; 20: 9. doi:10.1186/s12890-019-1040-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zoratti E, Havstad S, Wegienka G, et al. . Differentiating asthma phenotypes in young adults through polyclonal cytokine profiles. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 113: 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schatz M, Rosenwasser L. The allergic asthma phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014; 2: 645–648. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2014.09.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laviolette M, Gossage DL, Gauvreau G, et al. . Effects of benralizumab on airway eosinophils in asthmatic patients with sputum eosinophilia. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 132: 1086–1096. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types