Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associations with breast density and patient's characteristics
- PMID: 39060886
- DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01860-5
Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associations with breast density and patient's characteristics
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate if background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), graded according to the 2022 CEM-dedicated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, is associated with breast density, menopausal status, and age.
Methods: This bicentric retrospective analysis included CEM examinations performed for the work-up of suspicious mammographic findings. Three readers independently and blindly evaluated BPE on recombined CEM images and breast density on low-energy CEM images. Inter-reader reliability was estimated using Fleiss κ. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed, dichotomising breast density and BPE as low (a/b BI-RADS categories, minimal/mild BPE) and high (c/d BI-RADS categories, moderate/marked BPE).
Results: A total of 200 women (median age 56.8 years, interquartile range 50.5-65.6, 140/200 in menopause) were included. Breast density was classified as a in 27/200 patients (13.5%), as b in 110/200 (55.0%), as c in 52/200 (26.0%), and as d in 11/200 (5.5%), with moderate inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.536; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.482-0.590). BPE was minimal in 95/200 patients (47.5%), mild in 64/200 (32.0%), moderate in 25/200 (12.5%), marked in 16/200 (8.0%), with substantial inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.634; 95% CI 0.581-0.686). At multivariable logistic regression, premenopausal status and breast density were significant positive predictors of high BPE, with adjusted odds ratios of 6.120 (95% CI 1.847-20.281, p = 0.003) and 2.416 (95% CI 1.095-5.332, p = 0.029) respectively.
Conclusion: BPE on CEM is associated with well-established breast cancer risk factors, being higher in women with higher breast density and premenopausal status.
Keywords: Breast density; Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Menopause.
© 2024. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.
References
-
- Bauer E, Levy MS, Domachevsky L et al (2022) Background parenchymal enhancement and uptake as breast cancer imaging biomarkers: a state-of-the-art review. Clin Imaging 83:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.11.021 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liao GJ, Henze Bancroft LC, Strigel RM et al (2020) Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a comprehensive review. J Magn Reson Imaging 51:43–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26762 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. Radiographics 34:234–247. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.341135034 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arslan G, Celik L, Cubuk R et al (2017) Background parenchymal enhancement: is it just an innocent effect of estrogen on the breast? Diagnostic Interv Radiol 23:414–419. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2017.17048 - DOI
-
- Pike MC, Pearce CL (2013) Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk. Ann Oncol 24:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt310 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical