Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 16;16(14):2553.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16142553.

Imaging and Metabolic Diagnostic Methods in the Stage Assessment of Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Imaging and Metabolic Diagnostic Methods in the Stage Assessment of Rectal Cancer

Rafał Maksim et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Rectal cancer (RC) is a prevalent malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The accurate staging of RC is crucial for optimal treatment planning and patient outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current literature on imaging and metabolic diagnostic methods used in the stage assessment of RC. Various imaging modalities play a pivotal role in the initial evaluation and staging of RC. These include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). MRI has emerged as the gold standard for local staging due to its superior soft tissue resolution and ability to assess tumor invasion depth, lymph node involvement, and the presence of extramural vascular invasion. CT imaging provides valuable information about distant metastases and helps determine the feasibility of surgical resection. ERUS aids in assessing tumor depth, perirectal lymph nodes, and sphincter involvement. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic modality is essential for accurate staging and treatment decisions in RC. Furthermore, the integration of multiple imaging and metabolic methods, such as PET/CT or PET/MRI, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide valuable prognostic information. Thus, a literature review was conducted to investigate and assess the effectiveness and accuracy of diagnostic methods, both imaging and metabolic, in the stage assessment of RC.

Keywords: CT; EUS; MRI; PET/CT; PET/MRI; imaging diagnosis; rectal cancer; stage assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A rectal tumor (arrow) detected using CT in the (A) sagittal, (B) transverse, and (C) coronal planes, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Virtual Colonoscopy (CTC). The image depicts a polyp in the large intestine (arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
PET/MR images on a 3-tesla Biograph mMR Siemens® scanner using fluorodeoxyglucose labeled with fluorine (18F-FDG). The images show rectal cancer (arrow), respectively: (a) MR in T2-weighted sequence, (b) MR in T1-weighted sequence, and (c) fusion of MR images in T1-weighted sequence and PET.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giesen L.J.X., Olthof P.B., Elferink M.A.G., van Westreenen H.L., Beets G.L., Verhoef C., Dekker J.W.T. Changes in rectal cancer treatment after the introduction of a national screening program; Increasing use of less invasive strategies within a national cohort. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022;48:1117–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.132. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lang D., Ciombor K.K. Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Cancer in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: Rising Global Incidence and Unique Challenges. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2022;20:1169–1175. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Didkowska J., Barańska K., Miklewska M.J., Wojciechowska U. Cancer incidence and mortality in Poland in 2023, Nowotwory. J. Oncol. 2024;74:75–93. doi: 10.5603/NJO.99065. - DOI
    1. Fazeli M.S., Keramati M.R. Rectal cancer: A review. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran. 2015;29:171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hassan M.M., Phan A., Li D., Dagohoy C.G., Leary C., Yao J.C. Risk factors associated with neuroendocrine tumors: A U.S.-based case-control study. Int. J. Cancer. 2008;123:867–873. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23529. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources