Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39061702
- PMCID: PMC11276230
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141564
Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: In recent years, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of low magnetic induction devices with less than 1 T, referred to as Low-Field MRI (LF MRI). LF MRI systems were used, especially in the early days of magnetic resonance technology. Over time, magnetic induction values of 1.5 and 3 T have become the standard for clinical devices, mainly because LF MRI systems were suffering from significantly lower quality of the images, e.g., signal-noise ratio. In recent years, due to advances in image processing with artificial intelligence, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of LF MRI with induction of less than 1 T. This overview article focuses on the analysis of the evidence concerning the diagnostic efficacy of modern LF MRI systems and the clinical comparison of LF MRI with 1.5 T systems in imaging the nervous system, musculoskeletal system, and organs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.
Methodology: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for the period 2018-2023 was performed according to the recommended PRISMA protocol. Data were analysed to identify studies comparing the accuracy, reliability and diagnostic performance of LF MRI technology compared to available 1.5 T MRI.
Results: A total of 1275 publications were retrieved from the selected databases. Only two articles meeting all predefined inclusion criteria were selected for detailed assessment.
Conclusions: A limited number of robust studies on the accuracy and diagnostic performance of LF MRI compared with 1.5 T MRI was available. The current evidence is not sufficient to draw any definitive insights. More scientific research is needed to make informed conclusions regarding the effectiveness of LF MRI technology.
Keywords: diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic efficacy; low field magnetic resonance; magnetic resonance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(3):1-55. Epub 2010 Mar 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074406 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging for brain tumors: A systematic review.Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Oct 6;14:357. doi: 10.25259/SNI_510_2023. eCollection 2023. Surg Neurol Int. 2023. PMID: 37941620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(12):1-38. Epub 2010 Jun 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074389 Free PMC article.
-
Point-Of-Care low-field MRI in acute Stroke (POCS): protocol for a multicentric prospective open-label study evaluating diagnostic accuracy.BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):e075614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075614. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38296269 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the available evidence for the use of 7-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurological and musculoskeletal disorders, with comparison to 3-T and 1.5-T MRI: A systematic scoping review.Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16557. doi: 10.1111/ene.16557. Eur J Neurol. 2025. PMID: 39676509 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Feasibility and Usability of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pediatric Neuroimaging in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Study.Med Devices (Auckl). 2025 Feb 14;18:107-121. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S478864. eCollection 2025. Med Devices (Auckl). 2025. PMID: 39967747 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sheth K.N., Mazurek M.H., Yuen M.M., Cahn B.A., Shah J.T., Ward A., Kim J.A., Gilmore E.J., Falcone G.J., Petersen N., et al. Assessment of Brain Injury Using Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging at the Bedside of Critically Ill Patients. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:41–47. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Anoardo E., Rodriguez G.G. New challenges and opportunities for low-field MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Open. 2023;14:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.jmro.2022.100086. - DOI
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources