Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 21;11(7):754.
doi: 10.3390/children11070754.

Measurement Method Options to Investigate Digital Screen Technology Use by Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Measurement Method Options to Investigate Digital Screen Technology Use by Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review

Amber Beynon et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

The role and potential impact of digital screen technology in the lives of children is heavily debated. Current evidence is limited by the weakness of measures typically used to characterise screen use, predominantly proxy- or self-reports with known inaccuracy and bias. However, robust and detailed evidence is needed to provide practical trustworthy guidance to families and professionals working with families. The purpose of this paper is to support researchers to select measurement method(s) that will provide robust and detailed evidence. The paper outlines the challenges in measuring contemporary screen use by children, using a child-technology interaction model to organise considerations. A range of different methods used to measure digital screen technology use in children and adolescents (i.e., questionnaires, diaries, electronically prompted sampling, direct observation, fixed room cameras, wearable/portable cameras, audio recorders, screen-device onboard logging, remote digital trace logging and proximity logging) are described along with examples of their use and constructs typically measured as well as a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each method. A checklist and worked examples are provided to support researchers determining the best methods or combination of methods for a research project.

Keywords: children; method; screen use; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Child-Technology Interaction model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Researcher considerations checklist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cerniglia L., Cimino S. A reflection on controversial literature on screen time and educational apps use in 0–5 years old children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:4641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134641. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campana K., Mills J.E., Haines C., Prendergast T., Martens M. To tech or not to tech? The debate about technology, young children, and the library. Child. Libr. 2019;17:20–26. doi: 10.5860/cal.17.2.20. - DOI
    1. Browne D., Thompson D.A., Madigan S. Digital media use in children: Clinical vs scientific responsibilities. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:111–112. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4559. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Straker L., Zabatiero J., Danby S., Thorpe K., Edwards S. Conflicting guidelines on young children’s screen time and use of digital technology create policy and practice dilemmas. J. Pediatr. 2018;202:300–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Homer B.D., Kinzer C.K., Plass J.L., Letourneau S.M., Hoffman D., Bromley M., Hayward E.O., Turkay S., Kornak Y. Moved to learn: The effects of interactivity in a Kinect-based literacy game for beginning readers. Comput. Educ. 2014;74:37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.007. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources