Optimizing Newborn Outcomes in Cesarean Sections: A Comparative Analysis of Stress Indicators under General and Spinal Anesthesia
- PMID: 39062232
- PMCID: PMC11276436
- DOI: 10.3390/children11070783
Optimizing Newborn Outcomes in Cesarean Sections: A Comparative Analysis of Stress Indicators under General and Spinal Anesthesia
Abstract
Background and objectives: The moment of birth represents a complex physiological process that is followed by adaptive changes in the vital systems of the newborn. Such reactions have their positive but also negative effects. The aim of this research was to determine the difference in laboratory values of stress indicators in newborn children delivered by cesarean section (CS) with general and spinal anesthesia. We attempted to make a recommendation about the optimal type of anesthesia based on our results.
Materials and methods: The study was performed on 150 healthy term newborns delivered by urgent or planned CS. Samples for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, triglycerides, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were analyzed.
Results: Leukocyte numbers, triglycerides, and blood sugar values were normal for the newborns' age, with statistically significantly lower values of blood sugar and triglycerides in newborns delivered by CS in spinal anesthesia (p < 0.005) compared to general anesthesia. There were no significant differences in ACTH, cortisol, and IL-6 levels between those newborns delivered via CS after spinal or general anesthesia.
Conclusions: In cases where vaginal delivery is not possible, when CS is indicated, the use of well-controlled spinal anesthesia is followed by lower degrees of metabolic, inflammatory, and stress responses and better vitality of the baby upon birth.
Keywords: anesthesia; cesarean section; newborns.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Short-term outcome of newborn infants: spinal versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. A prospective randomized study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Dec 10;100(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00417-1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001. PMID: 11728657 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of birth anesthesia on the parameters of oxygenation and acid-base balance in umbilical cord blood.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3445-3452. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1574740. Epub 2019 Feb 10. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. PMID: 30678513
-
Natural killer cell activity and delivery: possible influence of cortisol and anesthetic agents. A study on newborn cord blood.Biol Neonate. 1999 Dec;76(6):348-54. doi: 10.1159/000014178. Biol Neonate. 1999. PMID: 10567763
-
Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting.Int J Surg Open. 2020;26:101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Sep 3. Int J Surg Open. 2020. PMID: 34568612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Single Intravenous Dexamethasone in Prolongation of Spinal Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Elective Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Pain Res. 2024 Apr 5;17:1361-1368. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S451595. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38596353 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Maternal Spinal Anesthesia on Newborn Out-Comes: A Clinical Perspective.Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;12(4):450. doi: 10.3390/children12040450. Children (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40310089 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sharma A., Ford S., Calvert J. Adaptation for life: A review of neonatal physiology. Anest. Int. Care Med. 2011;12:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2010.11.003. - DOI
-
- Vats A., Marbaniang M.J. The principles and conduct of Anaesthesia. Surgery. 2019;37:441–449.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources