Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 30;21(7):861.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070861.

Exploring Health Research Priority Setting in a South African Province: A Nominal Group Technique Approach

Affiliations

Exploring Health Research Priority Setting in a South African Province: A Nominal Group Technique Approach

Christo Heunis et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In August 2022, the Free State Provincial Health Research Committee used the online nominal group technique (NGT) for Health Research Priority Setting (HRPS) for the Free State Department of Health (FSDoH) and the research community, considering various stakeholders' perspectives. This paper explores and describes the identified health research priorities. It also assesses their alignment with the National Health Research Strategy. Additionally, it provides an opinion on the feasibility of using the online NGT for collaborative co-creation of provincial-level health research priorities. Most of the identified health research priorities resonate with the national health research priorities identified by the National Health Research Committee. However, research to "strengthen surveillance" was uniquely perceived to be a priority by the participants in the Free State HRPS exercise. A plausible reason for this might be their heightened awareness of the vital role optimal surveillance systems play in coordinating intersectoral responses to pandemics, particularly considering the serious challenges emerging during the initial stages of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Keywords: Free State province; health research priority setting; online nominal group technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Viergever R.F., Olifson S., Ghaffar A., Terry R.F. A checklist for health research priority setting: Nine common themes of good practice. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2010;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-36. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGregor S., Henderson K.J., Kaldor J.M. How are health research priorities set in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published reports. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108787. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madden M., Morley R. Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: Reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership. Res. Involv. Engagem. 2016;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . A Systematic Approach for Undertaking a Research Priority-Setting Exercise: Guidance for WHO Staff. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020.
    1. Murray J., Heyman I., Dougall N., Wooff A., Aston E., Enang I. Co-creation of five key research priorities across law enforcement and public health: A methodological example and outcomes. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2021;28:3–15. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12664. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources