Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):3999.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13143999.

The Impact of Race/Ethnicity on Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Neuraxial Anesthesia for Hip and Femoral Shaft Fractures

Affiliations

The Impact of Race/Ethnicity on Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Neuraxial Anesthesia for Hip and Femoral Shaft Fractures

Daniel Qian et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The use of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery remains an active area of research, with recent studies demonstrating mixed findings supporting neuraxial over general anesthesia. The benefits of neuraxial anesthesia have been documented in associated surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty. However, racial disparities in the administration of neuraxial anesthesia have been identified in numerous procedures. We aimed to examine the association of race/ethnicity with neuraxial anesthesia use and the effect of neuraxial anesthesia on length of stay, non-home discharge, 30-day severe adverse events, and rates of readmission among patients undergoing isolated hip and femoral shaft fracture operations. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database was queried for isolated hip or femoral shaft fractures from 2015 to 2019. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between race/ethnicity and neuraxial anesthesia use. Within each sex-race stratum, neuraxial anesthesia recipients were propensity-matched to general anesthesia recipients in a 1:2 ratio. Logistic regression and negative binomial regression were performed on the propensity-matched cohort. Results: A total of 12,004 neuraxial and 64,250 general anesthesia hip and femoral shaft fracture patients were identified. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were between 0.64 and 0.61 times less likely to receive neuraxial anesthesia over general anesthesia, respectively (p < 0.05). 11,993 patients who received neuraxial anesthesia were propensity matched to 23,946 patients who received general anesthesia. Propensity-matched logistic regressions found that neuraxial anesthesia was associated with decreased length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, and acute rehab/skilled nursing facility discharge for White patients (p < 0.05 for all), but only decreased length of stay in Black and Hispanic patients (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Notable disparities exist in the administration of neuraxial anesthesia for isolated hip and femoral shaft fracture patients. Hispanic and Black race/ethnicity in particular influences provision of neuraxial anesthesia. Further research is required to understand the degree of effect modification and root causes of regional anesthesia access and benefits for this high-volume patient population.

Keywords: femoral shaft fracture; health disparities; hip fracture; neuraxial anesthesia; regional anesthesia; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Within each sex–race unique stratum, patients who received neuraxial versus general anesthesia were propensity-matched in a 1:2 ratio using the nearest distance method without replacement. The matched cohort includes 11,993 neuraxial and 23,946 general anesthesia patients.

Similar articles

References

    1. Veronese N., Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018;49:1458–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ettinger B., Black D.M., Dawson-Hughes B., Pressman A.R., Melton L.J., III Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAX. Osteoporos. Int. 2010;21:25–33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1032-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Enninghorst N., McDougall D., Evans J.A., Sisak K., Balogh Z.J. Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:1516–1520. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c3dc9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holy C.E., Vanderkarr M., Chitnis A.S., Sparks C. Femoral Shaft Fractures: Treatment Costs and Complication Risks—A Claims Database Analysis. Value Health. 2018;21:S177. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1178. - DOI
    1. Luger T.J., Kammerlander C., Gosch M., Luger M.F., Kammerlander-Knauer U., Roth T., Kreutziger J. Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: Does it matter. Osteoporos. Int. 2010;21:555–572. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1399-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources