Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 13;13(14):4103.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13144103.

Molecular Genetic Analysis of Perioperative Colonization by Infection-Related Microorganisms in Patients Receiving Intraoral Microvascular Grafts

Affiliations

Molecular Genetic Analysis of Perioperative Colonization by Infection-Related Microorganisms in Patients Receiving Intraoral Microvascular Grafts

Henriette Louise Moellmann et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In oral and maxillofacial surgery, the reconstruction of defects often involves the transfer of skin tissue into the oral cavity utilizing microvascular grafts. This study investigates postoperative changes in microbial colonization following intraoral microvascular transplantation, as well as potential influencing factors. Methods: In 37 patients undergoing intraoral reconstructions, pre- and postoperative swabs were taken from the donor and recipient regions to quantify the seven selected marker bacteria using TaqMan PCRs. Patient-specific factors and clinical data were also recorded. Results: The infection-associated Acinetobacter baumannii tended to decrease postoperatively, while the infectious pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and the family of Enterobacteriaceae showed a postoperative increase without being directly associated with a clinical infection. Streptococcus mitis showed a significant postoperative decrease on buccal mucosa and increase on the graft surface (oral dysbiosis) and was significantly reduced or displaced by other bacteria (e.g., Mycoplasma salivarium, positive selection) when treated with ampicillin/sulbactam. Conclusions: The cutaneous microbiome of the graft adapts to the local intraoral environment. Postoperative shifts in oral bacterial colonization and an increase in infection-relevant bacteria were observed. These perioperative changes in colonization are also influenced by the administration of ampicillin/sulbactam. Consequently, single doses of antibiotics appear to be more beneficial compared to longer-term preventive use.

Keywords: antibiotics; microvascular reconstruction; oral microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Difference in the respective load of bacteria detection in relation to the reference swab W0; Shown are the swabs from the cheek (W), graft (T) and suture (N) at the preoperative time point (0), early postoperative time point (1) and late postoperative time point (2), +++ = Highly increased bacterial load (Δ [X] − [W0] > 1 × 106 GE/sample); ++ = Moderately increased bacterial load (Δ [X] − [W0] > 1 × 103 and < 1 × 106 GE/sample); + = Slightly increased bacterial load (Δ [X] − [W0] > 0 and < 1 × 103 GE/sample); 0 = No positive evidence; - = Slightly reduced bacterial load (Δ [X] − [W0] > −1 × 103 and <0 to GE/sample), -- = Moderately reduced bacterial load (Δ [X] − [W0] > −1 × 106 and < −1 × 103 GE/sample); --- Highly reduced bacterial load (Δ [X] − [W0] > −1 × 106 GE/sample); Ø = No data available.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Exemplary results of quantitative bacterial detections (GE/sample) of S. mitis, M. salivarium, Enterobacteriaceae and A. baumannii; the results of all 37 participants are shown on cheek (W), graft (T) and suture swab (N) at the preoperative time point (0), early postoperative time point (1) and late postoperative time point (2). * p <0.05; ** p <0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Perioperative leukocyte counts (left) and perioperative C-reactive protein values (right) of all study participants. ** p <0.01; *** p <0.001.

References

    1. Lai C.-S., Chang Y.-T., Shen C.-H., Tsai Y.-C., Lu C.-T., Yen J.-H., Chen I.-C., Lin Y.-L. The role of vein grafts in reconstructive head and neck microsurgery. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88((Suppl. S4)):S81–S88. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karakida K., Aoki T., Ota Y., Yamazaki H., Otsuru M., Takahashi M., Sakamoto H., Miyasaka M. Analysis of risk factors for surgical-site infections in 276 oral cancer surgeries with microvascular free-flap reconstructions at a single university hospital. J. Infect. Chemother. 2010;16:334–339. doi: 10.1007/s10156-010-0108-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novakovic D., Patel R.S., Goldstein D.P., Gullane P.J. Salvage of failed free flaps used in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1:33. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-33. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong C.-H., Wei F.-C. Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2010;32:1236–1245. doi: 10.1002/hed.21284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel S.Y., Kim D.D., Ghali G.E. Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Vascularized Fibula Free Flaps and Endosseous Implants. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2019;31:259–284. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2018.12.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources