Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jul 2;60(7):1084.
doi: 10.3390/medicina60071084.

Utilization of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Utilization of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chi-Bo Lin et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of ureteral access sheath (UAS) utilization in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 30 August 2023. The inclusion criteria comprised English-language original studies on RIRS with or without UAS in humans. The primary outcome was SFR, while the secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, the lengths of the operation and the hospitalization period, and the duration of the fluoroscopy. Subgroup analyses and a sensitivity analysis were performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's regression tests. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while mean differences (MDs) were employed for continuous variables. Results: We included 22 studies in our analysis. These spanned 2001 to 2023, involving 12,993 patients and 13,293 procedures. No significant difference in SFR was observed between the UAS and non-UAS groups (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.63-1.30, p = 0.59). Intraoperative (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.75-1.69, p = 0.5) and postoperative complications (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.89-1.87, p = 0.18) did not significantly differ between the groups. UAS usage increased operation times (MD = 8.30, 95% CI 2.51-14.10, p = 0.005) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 5.73, 95% CI 4.55-6.90, p < 0.001). No publication bias was detected for any outcome. Conclusions: In RIRS, UAS usage did not significantly affect SFR, complications, or hospitalization time. However, it increased operation time and fluoroscopy time. Routine UAS usage is not supported, and decisions should be patient-specific. Further studies with larger sample sizes and standardized assessments are needed to refine UAS utilization in RIRS.

Keywords: meta-analysis; retrograde intrarenal surgery; stone-free rate; ureteral access sheath.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the SFRs [10,11,13,14,15,16,20,21,22,23,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the intraoperative complications [10,14,19,21,22,32,34,35].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the postoperative complications [10,11,13,15,16,18,20,21,22,31,32,33,38].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of the operation times [11,12,13,15,16,17,18,20,21,32,33,35].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of the hospitalization times [15,16,21,32,33].
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of the fluoroscopy times [13,21].

References

    1. Romero V., Akpinar H., Assimos D.G. Kidney stones: A global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev. Urol. 2010;12:e86–e96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cauni V., Mihai B., Tănase F., Perşu C., Ciofu I. Application of laser technology in urinary stone treatment. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Techniques—Série Électrotechnique et Énergétique. 2022;67:85–89.
    1. EAU Pocket Guidelines. Edn. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. EAU Guidelines Office; Arnhem, The Netherlands: 2023.
    1. Takayasu H., Aso Y. Recent Development for Pyeloureteroscopy: Guide Tube Method for Its Introduction into the Ureter. J. Urol. 1974;112:176–178. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59675-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Coninck V., Keller E.X., Rodríguez-Monsalve M., Audouin M., Doizi S., Traxer O. Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: Facts and myths. BJU Int. 2018;122:959–969. doi: 10.1111/bju.14389. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources