Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;25(5):3713-3728.
doi: 10.1177/15248380241257957. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

Coercive Control in 2SLGBTQQIA+ Relationships: A Scoping Review

N Zoe Hilton  1   2 , Elke Ham  2 , Dana L Radatz  3 , Chris M Smith  1 , Natalie Snow  4   5 , Jolene Wintermute  2 , Emma Jennings-Fitz-Gerald  1 , Jimin Lee  1 , Sydney Patterson  1
Affiliations

Coercive Control in 2SLGBTQQIA+ Relationships: A Scoping Review

N Zoe Hilton et al. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Existing measures and theories of intimate partner coercive control largely evaluate men's coercion of women. The extent of knowledge pertaining to intimate relationships among other genders and sexual identities is unclear. Guided by a theoretical framework of intersectionality, we examined and synthesized original studies on coercive control by (perpetration) or against (victimization) Two Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, questioning, intersex, and asexual individuals within intimate partner relationships. We searched eight academic databases for records from 2014 through 2022 and hand-searched review articles' reference lists, supplemented with gray literature and website searches. Using duplicate screening, we identified 1,774 unique documents; 526 met preliminary eligibility criteria and 277 were retained for data extraction in duplicate. Coercive control was more common among minority individuals and was related to mental health challenges. Few studies reported on gender- or sexual-identity specific forms of coercive control, and an intersectional focus was uncommon. This review revealed a lack of agreed definition of coercive control or accepted standard of measurement, and a gap in research with individuals who identify as gender diverse, gender fluid or intersex, or those identifying their sexuality as asexual, pansexual, or sexually diverse.

Keywords: IPV; LGBTQ; coercive control; intimate partner violence; two spirit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow chart including academic and gray literature sources.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson V. N. (2020). Trans prejudice and its potential links to IPV among trans people. In Russell B. (Ed.), Intimate partner violence and the LGBT+ community (pp. 91–110). Springer International Publishing.
    1. *Araya A. C., Warwick R., Shumer D., Selkie E. (2021). Romantic relationships in transgender adolescents: A qualitative study. Pediatrics, 147(2), e2020007906. 10.1542/peds.2020-007906 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arksey H., O’Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. *Basile K. C., Clayton H. B., DeGue S., Gilford J. W., Vagi K. J., Suarez N. A., Zwald M. L., Lowry R. (2020). Interpersonal violence victimization among high school students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Supplements, 69(1), 28–37. 10.15585/mmwr.su6901a4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. *Becerra M. B., Rodriquez E. J., Avina R. M., Becerra B. J. (2021). Experiences of violence and mental health outcomes among Asian American transgender adults in the United States. PLoS One, 16(3), e0247812. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247812 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources