Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;25(7):2573-2577.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.7.2573.

ChecKAP: A Checklist for Reporting a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Study

Affiliations

ChecKAP: A Checklist for Reporting a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Study

Fatemeh Zarei et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) model is a foundational tool in public health research. KAP surveys play a vital role in this process by gauging a population's current level of knowledge about a specific health issue. Rigorous evaluation is essential for ensuring the validity and reliability of KAP studies. Therefore, in this study, a comprehensive checklist for reporting Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) Studies was developed.

Methodology: This study was conducted using a systematic six-step roadmap. A comprehensive review of available relevant quality assessment tools led to the development of specific new items. An expert panel reviewed the initial draft, and after corrections were made, the second draft was finalized and subjected to psychometric analysis by experts.

Results: The development of ChecKAP (Checklist for Reporting Items for Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice) represents a significant contribution to KAP studies. The final tool consists of 46 items across 8 fields: title (1 item), abstract (6 items), keywords (1 item), introduction (6 items), method (11 items), findings (7 items), discussion (15 items), and conclusion (1 item).

Conclusion: ChecKAP assesses the inherent complexity of KAP research methods and ensures consistent reporting. It fills an important gap in the KAP research literature and serves a dual purpose. First, it acts as a quality assessment tool for reviewers, enabling them to evaluate the methodological rigor and clarity of submitted manuscripts. Second, it serves as a guideline for authors, promoting a more systematic and transparent approach to reporting.

Keywords: Attitude; Checklist; Knowledge; Practice; guideline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Andrade C, Menon V, Ameen S, Kumar Praharaj S. Designing and conducting knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys in psychiatry: Practical guidance. Indian J Psychol Med. 2020;42(5):478–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar KVN, Bindhu DG, Likhitha K, Charani MS, Priya ND, Gowthami Y. Cancer literacy in women: A kap exploration of breast and gynecological cancers accompanied by cross-sectional based online survey in tirupathi district. Asian Pac J Environ Cancer. 2024;7(1):3–10.
    1. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Theory, research, and practice in health behavior and health education. 2008.
    1. Gumucio S, Luhmann N, Fauvel G, Zompi S, Ronsse A, Courcaud A, Bouchon M, Trehin C, Schapman S. Data collection quantitative methods, the kap survey model (knowledge, attitude and practices) IGC communigraphie. Etienne, France: 201.
    1. Sybille G, Merica M, Luhmann N, Fauvel G, Zompi S, Ronsse A, et al. Retrieved from. 2011, authors. The kap survey model (knowledge, attitude and practices)