Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Jul 19:rs.3.rs-4757157.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4757157/v1.

Enhancing the Implementation and Integration of mHealth Interventions in Resource-Limited Settings: A Scoping Review

Wilson Tumuhimbise  1 , Stefanie Theuring  2 , Fred Kaggwa  1 , Esther C Atukunda  3 , John Rubaihayo  4 , Daniel Atwine  5 , Juliet N Sekandi  6 , Angella Musiimenta  7
Affiliations

Enhancing the Implementation and Integration of mHealth Interventions in Resource-Limited Settings: A Scoping Review

Wilson Tumuhimbise et al. Res Sq. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Although mobile health (mHealth) interventions have shown promise in improving health outcomes, most of them rarely translate to scale. Prevailing mHealth studies are largely small-sized, short-term and donor-funded pilot studies with limited evidence on their effectiveness. To facilitate scale-up, several frameworks have been proposed to enhance the generic implementation of health interventions. However, there is a lack of a specific focus on the implementation and integration of mHealth interventions in routine care in low-resource settings. Our scoping review aimed to synthesize and develop a framework that could guide the implementation and integration of mHealth interventions.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases for published theories, models, and frameworks related to the implementation and integration of clinical interventions from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2023. The data processing was guided by a scoping review methodology proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Studies were included if they were i) peer-reviewed and published between 2000 and 2023, ii) explicitly described a framework for clinical intervention implementation and integration, or iii) available in full text and published in English. We integrated different domains and constructs from the reviewed frameworks to develop a new framework for implementing and integrating mHealth interventions.

Results: We identified eight eligible papers with eight frameworks composed of 102 implementation domains. None of the identified frameworks were specific to the integration of mHealth interventions in low-resource settings. Two constructs (skill impartation and intervention awareness) related to the training domain, four constructs (technical and logistical support, identifying committed staff, supervision, and redesigning) from the restructuring domain, two constructs (monetary incentives and nonmonetary incentives) from the incentivize domain, two constructs (organizational mandates and government mandates) from the mandate domain and two constructs (collaboration and routine workflows) from the integrate domain. Therefore, a new framework that outlines five main domains-train, restructure, incentivize, mandate, and integrate (TRIMI)-in relation to the integration and implementation of mHealth interventions in low-resource settings emerged.

Conclusion: The TRIMI framework presents a realistic and realizable solution for the implementation and integration deficits of mHealth interventions in low-resource settings.

Keywords: framework; implementation; integration; mHealth; resource-limited settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Declaration of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for the selected studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the TRIMI Domains and constructs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Manyati TK, Mutsau M. A systematic review of the factors that hinder the scale up of mobile health technologies in antenatal care programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2021;13(1):125–31.
    1. Opoku D, Stephani V, Quentin W. A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC medicine. 2017;15(1):1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deepa M, Shruti M, Mohan V. Reducing the global burden of diabetes using mobile health. Diabetes Digital Health: Elsevier; 2020. p. 3–23.
    1. Tumuhimbise W, Musiimenta A. A review of mobile health interventions for public private mix in tuberculosis care. Internet interventions. 2021;25:100417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osei E, Mashamba-Thompson TP. Mobile health applications for disease screening and treatment support in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2021;7(3). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources