Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 7:42:100954.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100954. eCollection 2024 Jul.

In-hospital mortality, comorbidities, and costs of one million mechanically ventilated patients in Germany: a nationwide observational study before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

In-hospital mortality, comorbidities, and costs of one million mechanically ventilated patients in Germany: a nationwide observational study before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic

Christian Karagiannidis et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: Even more than hospital care in general, intensive care and mechanical ventilation capacities and its utilization in terms of rates, indications, ventilation types and outcomes vary largely among countries. We analyzed complete and nationwide data for Germany, a country with a large intensive care sector, before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Analysis of administrative claims data, provided by the German health insurance, from all hospitals for all individual patients who were mechanically ventilated between 2019 and 2022. The data included age, sex, diagnoses, length of stay, procedures (e.g., form and duration of mechanical ventilation), outcome (dead vs. alive) and costs. We included all patients who were at least 18 years old at the time of discharge from January 1st, 2019 to December 31st, 2022. Patients were grouped according to year, age group and the form of mechanical ventilation. We further analyzed subgroups of patients being resuscitated and those being COVID-19 positive (vs. negative).

Findings: During the four years, 1,003,882 patients were mechanically ventilated in 1395 hospitals. Rates per 100,000 inhabitants varied across age groups from 110 to 123 (18-59 years) to 1101-1275 (>80 years). The top main diagnoses were other forms of heart diseases, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ischemic heart diseases and cerebrovascular diseases. 43.3% (437,031/1,003,882) of all mechanically ventilated patients died in hospital with a remarkable increase in mortality with age and from 2019 to 2022 by almost 5%-points. The in-hospital mortality of ventilated COVID-19 patients was 53.7% (46,553/86,729), while it was 42.6% (390,478/917,153) in non-COVID patients. In-hospital mortality varied from 27.0% in non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) only to 53.4% in invasive mechanical ventilation only cases, 59.4% with early NIV failure, 68.6% with late NIV failure, to 74.0% in patients receiving VV-ECMO and 80.0% in VA-ECMO. 17.5% of mechanically ventilated patients had been resuscitated before, of whom 78.2% (153,762/196,750) died. Total expenditure was around 6 billion Euros per year, i.e. 0.17% of the German GDP.

Interpretation: Mechanical ventilation was widely used, before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, reaching more than 1000 patients per 100,000 inhabitants per year in the age over 80 years. In-hospital mortality rates in this nationwide and complete cohort exceeded most of the data known by far.

Funding: This research did not receive any dedicated funding.

Keywords: ARDS; COVID; Mechncial ventilation; Mortality; NIV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.K. received lecture fees from Maquet, Rastatt, Germany. C.K. received travel grants and fees for advisory board meetings from Xenios (Germany) and Bayer (Germany). C.K. is the speaker of the German register of ICUs and Member of the Government Commission on Modern and Needs-based Hospital Care; Member of the Expert Commission on “Resilience and Health”. F.K., C.B. and J.W. work for the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds (GKV-Spitzenverband). T.B. reports no conflicts of interest. W.W. received grants from Löwenstein Medical, Germany, Philips/Respironics, USA and GCI, Great Britain and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Germany, Sentec, Switzerland, Chiesi, Germany, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany, Novartis, Germany, BioNTech Europe GmbH Philips/Respironics, USA. R.B. reports honoraria for presentations on the ongoing hospital reform in Germany. He is Member of the Government Commission on Modern and Needs-based Hospital Care; Member of the Expert Commission on “Resilience and Health”; and Chair of the Scientic Advisory Board, Federal Association of General Local Sickness Funds.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A. Number of ventilated patients per 100,000 inhabitants in the corresponding age group. Data from US, Canada, and UK from 2018 show remarkable differences. For comparison, in the group of patients over 80 years in England approx. 200 patients are ventilated per 100,000 inhabitants, in Canada 700 per 100,000 and in the US 1800 per 100,000. B. Patients on mechanical ventilation (all) and with COVID-19 (red) on a daily base from 2019 to 2022. Only non-transferred cases are shown. Of note, mortality between transferred and non-transferred cases does not differ significantly. For further details see methods and discussion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A. Case numbers based on main diagnosis between 2019 and 2022 for patients having been mechanically ventilated, either invasively or non-invasively. B. Charlson Comorbidity Index in all patients with mechanical ventilation by age group and sex. C. Hours on ventilation (median and IQR) for different groups of MV patient Notes: Early NIV failure was defined by intubation <24 h, late NIV failure for those cases with NIV longer than 24 h. VA, veno-arterial; VV, veno-venous; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
In-hospital mortality rates by age and type of mechanical ventilation (for notes on types see Fig. 2C).

References

    1. Grasselli G., Calfee C.S., Camporota L., et al. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(7):727–759. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karagiannidis C., Mostert C., Hentschker C., et al. Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(9):853–862. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matthay M.A., Arabi Y., Arroliga A.C., et al. A new global definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209(1):37–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellani G., Laffey J.G., Pham T., et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. - PubMed
    1. Pham T., Heunks L., Bellani G., et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care units across 50 countries (WEAN SAFE): a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(5):465–476. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources