Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 26;24(3):10.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.7562. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.

The Danish Ibbis Trials for Sickness Absentees with Common Mental Disorders: A Phase 4 Prospective Study Comparing Randomized Trial and Real-World Data

Andreas Hoff  1 , Anders Bo Bojesen  1 , Lene Falgaard Eplov  1
Affiliations

The Danish Ibbis Trials for Sickness Absentees with Common Mental Disorders: A Phase 4 Prospective Study Comparing Randomized Trial and Real-World Data

Andreas Hoff et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: In two randomized controlled trials (RCT) we tested the efficacy of a novel integrated vocational rehabilitation and mental healthcare intervention, coined INT, for sickness absentees with common mental disorders. The aim was to improve vocational outcomes compared to Service As Usual (SAU). Contrary to expectations, the delivered intervention caused worse outcomes within some diagnostic groups and some benefits in others. In this phase 4 study, we examined the effectiveness of the intervention in real-world practice.

Method: In this prospective intervention study, we allocated adult sickness absentees with either depression, anxiety, or adjustment disorder to receive INT in a real-world setting in a Danish Municipality. We compared the vocational outcomes of this group to a matched group who received INT as a part of the RCTs, after randomization to the intervention group herein. Primary outcome was return to work at any point within 12 months.

Results: In the real-world group, 151 participants received INT during 2019. From the randomized trials, 302 matched participants who received INT between 2016-2018 were included. On the primary outcome - return to work within 12 months - the real-word group fared worse (48.3 vs 64.6 %, OR 0.54 [95%CI: 0.37-0.79], p = 0.001). Across most other vocational outcomes, a similar pattern of statistically significant poorer outcomes in the real-world group was observed: Lower number of weeks in work and lower proportion in work at 12 months (42.3% vs. 58.3% (p = 0.002)).

Discussion: The real-word group showed significantly worse vocational outcomes. Like in many other studies of complex interventions, implementation was difficult in the original randomized trials and perhaps even more difficult in the less structured real-world setting. Since the intervention was less effective for some groups compared to SAU in the original trial, this negative effect may be even more pronounced in a real-world setting.

Keywords: anxiety; common mental disorders; depression; integrated care; vocational rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Composition of intervention components
Figure 1
Composition of intervention components. “IBBIS” is a Danish acronym translating to “Integrated Health Care and Vocational Rehabilitation for Sick-Leave Benefit Recipients”.
Proportion in stable work per week (Red: Real world; Green: RCT
Figure 2
Proportion in stable work, per week. Red line: Real world-INT; Greenish line: RCT-INT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Søgaard HJ, Bech P. Psychiatric disorders in long-term sickness absence – a population-based cross-sectional study. Scand J Public Health. 2009; 37: 682–9. DOI: 10.1177/1403494809344357 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fagot J-P, Cuerq A, Samson S, Fagot-Campagna A. Cohort of one million patients initiating antidepressant treatment in France: 12-month follow-up. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2016; 70: 744–751. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12850 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoving J, Ravinskaya M, Verbeek J, Langendam M, Kunz R, Verstappen S, et al. The reporting of work participation outcomes and measurement methods in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Saf Health Work. 2022; 13: S103–S103. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.1076 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mikkelsen MB, Rosholm M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at enhancing return to work for sick-listed workers with common mental disorders, stress-related disorders, somatoform disorders and personality disorders. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105073 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000; 321: 694–696. DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.321.7262.694 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources