Twenty-three years of PCR-based seafood authentication assay development: What have we learned?
- PMID: 39073284
- DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.13401
Twenty-three years of PCR-based seafood authentication assay development: What have we learned?
Abstract
Seafood is a prime target for fraudulent activities due to the complexity of its supply chain, high demand, and difficult discrimination among species once morphological characteristics are removed. Instances of seafood fraud are expected to increase due to growing demand. This manuscript reviews the application of DNA-based methods for commercial fish authentication and identification from 2000 to 2023. It explores (1) the most common types of commercial fish used in assay development, (2) the type of method used, (3) the gene region most often targeted, (4) provides a case study of currently published assays or primer-probe pairs used for DNA amplification, for specificity, and (5) makes recommendations for ensuring standardized assay-based reporting for future studies. A total of 313 original assays for the detection and authentication of commercial fish species from 191 primary articles published over the last 23 years were examined. The most explored DNA-based method was real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), followed by DNA sequencing. The most targeted gene regions were cytb (cytochrome b) and COI (cytochrome c oxidase 1). Tuna was the most targeted commercial fish species. A case study of published tuna assays (n = 19) targeting the cytb region found that most assays were not species-specific through in silico testing. This was conducted by examining the primer mismatch for each assay using multiple sequence alignment. Therefore, there is need for more standardized DNA-based assay reporting in the literature to ensure specificity, reproducibility, and reliability of results. Factors, such as cost, sensitivity, quality of the DNA, and species, should be considered when designing assays.
Keywords: DNA sequencing; PCR; cytb; food authentication; seafood fraud.
© 2024 The Author(s). Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Institute of Food Technologists.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Acar, C., Ishizaki, S., & Nagashima, Y. (2017). Toxicity of the Lessepsian pufferfish Lagocephalus sceleratus from Eastern Mediterranean coasts of Turkey and species identification by rapid PCR amplification. European Food Research and Technology, 243(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217‐016‐2721‐1
-
- Ali, A., Di Taranto, P., Parisi, A., Del Sambro, L., Iannacci, A., Belluscio, D., Debernardis, D. P., & Normanno, G. (2022). A fish market survey using a novel PCR‐sequencing‐based protocols for the identification of commercial significant fish species. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 16, 656–669. https://doi.org/10.5219/1777
-
- Ali, A., Kreitlow, A., Plötz, M., Normanno, G., & Abdulmawjood, A. (2022). Development of loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for rapid and direct screening of Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in commercial fish products. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275452
-
- Aranishi, F., Okimoto, T., & Izumi, S. (2005). Identification of gadoid species (Pisces, Gadidae) by PCR‐RFLP analysis. Journal of Applied Genetics, 46(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1139/f04‐173
-
- Asensio, L., González, I., Fernández, A., Rodríguez, M. A., Lobo, E., Hernández, P. E., García, T., & Martín, R. (2002). Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis for identification of Grouper (Epinephelus guaza), wreck fish (Polyprion americanus), and Nile perch (Lates niloticus) fillets. Journal of Food Protection, 65(2), 432–435. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362‐028X‐65.2.432
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources

