Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;20(9):6146-6160.
doi: 10.1002/alz.14096. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

Alzheimer's disease genetic pathways impact cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and imaging endophenotypes in non-demented individuals

Affiliations

Alzheimer's disease genetic pathways impact cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and imaging endophenotypes in non-demented individuals

Luigi Lorenzini et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep.

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: Unraveling how Alzheimer's disease (AD) genetic risk is related to neuropathological heterogeneity, and whether this occurs through specific biological pathways, is a key step toward precision medicine.

Methods: We computed pathway-specific genetic risk scores (GRSs) in non-demented individuals and investigated how AD risk variants predict cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and imaging biomarkers reflecting AD pathology, cardiovascular, white matter integrity, and brain connectivity.

Results: CSF amyloidbeta and phosphorylated tau were related to most GRSs. Inflammatory pathways were associated with cerebrovascular disease, whereas quantitative measures of white matter lesion and microstructure integrity were predicted by clearance and migration pathways. Functional connectivity alterations were related to genetic variants involved in signal transduction and synaptic communication.

Discussion: This study reveals distinct genetic risk profiles in association with specific pathophysiological aspects in predementia stages of AD, unraveling the biological substrates of the heterogeneity of AD-associated endophenotypes and promoting a step forward in disease understanding and development of personalized therapies.

Highlights: Polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease encompasses six biological pathways that can be quantified with pathway-specific genetic risk scores, and differentially relate to cerebrospinal fluid and imaging biomarkers. Inflammatory pathways are mostly related to cerebrovascular burden. White matter health is associated with pathways of clearance and membrane integrity, whereas functional connectivity measures are related to signal transduction and synaptic communication pathways.

Keywords: biological pathways; magnetic resonance imaging; polygenic risk; preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EPAD is supported by the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) grant agreement 115736.

The project leading to this paper has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 115952. This Joint Undertaking receives the support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries Association (EFPIA). This communication reflects the views of the authors, and neither IMI nor the European Union (EU) and EFPIA are liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. A.M.W., H.M., L.E.C., and F.B. are supported by AMYPAD (IMI 115952). H.M. is supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (2020T049), the Eurostars‐2 joint programme with co‐funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ASPIRE E!113701), provided by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RvO), and by the EU Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, provided by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and Alzheimer Nederland (DEBBIE JPND2020‐568‐106). F.B. is supported by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), EU‐JU (IMI), National Institute for Health and Care Research ‐ Biomedical Research Center (NIHR‐BRC), General Eletronic (GE) HealthCare, and Alzheimer's Disease Data Initiative (ADDI; paid to institution); is a consultant for Combinostics, IXICO, and Roche; participates on advisory boards of Biogen, Prothena, and Merck; and is a co‐founder of Queen Square Analytics. L.E.C. has received research support from GE HealthCare Ltd. (paid to institution). C.F. is an employee of GE HealthCare Ltd. P.H.S. is a full‐time employee of EQT Life Sciences (formerly LSP) and professor emeritus at Amsterdam University Medical Centers. He has received consultancy fees (paid to the university) from Alzheon, Brainstorm Cell, and Green Valley. Within his university affiliation, he is global principal investigator of the Phase 1b study of AC Immune, Phase 2b study with FUJI‐film/Toyama, and Phase 2 study of UCB. He is past chair of the EU steering committee of the Phase 2b program of Vivoryon and the Phase 2b study of Novartis Cardiology, and he is presently co‐chair of the Phase 3 study with NOVO‐Nordisk. R.W. is an employee of IXICO. C.R. has done paid consultancy work in the last 3 years for Eli Lilly, Biogen, Actinogen, Brain Health Scotland, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Novo Nordisk, Eisai, Signant, Merck, Alchemab, Sygnature, and Abbvie. His group has received Research Income for his Research Unit from Biogen, AC Immune, and Roche. He has out‐licensed IP developed at the University of Edinburgh to Linus Health and is chief executive officer (CEO) and Founder of Scottish Brain Sciences. S.H. is a consultant for WYSS Center, Geneva, Switzerland, and a consultant for SPINEART, Geneva, Switzerland. G.C. has received research support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement number 667696), Fondation d'entreprise MMA des Entrepreneurs du Futur, Fondation Alzheimer, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Région Normandie, Association France Alzheimer et maladies apparentées, Fondation Vaincre Alzheimer, Fondation Recherche Alzheimer, and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (all to Inserm), and personal fees from Inserm and Fondation Alzheimer. A.J.S. is an employee and minor shareholder of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. J.O.B. has acted as a consultant for TauRx, Novo Nordisk, Biogen, Roche, Lilly, and GE Healthcare; and received grant support from Avid/ Lilly, Merck, and Alliance Medical.

R.E.M. has received a speaker fee from Illumina; is an advisor to the Epigenetic Clock Development Foundation; and has received consultant fees from Optima partners. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Results of the pathway analysis. The upper part of the figure shows the results of the clustering performed on identified pathways relating to the selected set of genes. The most frequent words from the pathways description within each cluster of pathways are visualized using word clouds. The lower part of the figure shows the contribution of each gene to each identified cluster, expressed as a log of odds ratios.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Association of global and pathway‐specific genetic risk scores (pathway‐GRSs) with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Forest plot reporting illustrating the association (standardized β coefficients, confidence intervals and p‐values) of GRS (with and without apolipoprotein E [APOE]) and the six pathway‐GRSs with CSF amyloid beta 1‐42 (Aβ1‐42) phosphorylated tau (p‐tau181). * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.005; *** = p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Association of global and pathway‐specific genetic risk scores (pathway‐GRSs) with radiological visual scores of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Boxplots represent the association of GRS (with and without apolipoprotein E) and the six pathway‐GRSs with Fazekas deep white matter hyperintensities (DWMHs; upper‐row), microbleeds (middle‐row), perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the basal ganglia (lower‐row). APOE, apolipoprotein E.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Association (n = 1334) of global and pathway‐GRSs with FLAIR and T1w MRI‐derived phenotypes. Upper‐left: shows FLAIR‐derived phenotypes as computed using BaMoS. From left to right, first WMH segmentation was performed, followed by grouping WMH volumes into the four major lobes, and finally in periventricular (blue and green) and deep (yellow and red) regions, effectively providing eight regions of interest. Lower‐left: T1w‐derived phenotypes are obtained from the LEAP pipeline. Right: β coefficients (colors) and p‐values (circles) of linear models with global (GRSnoAPOE) and pathway‐GRSs predicting MRI‐derived phenotypes. APOE, apolipoprotein E; FLAIR, fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery; T1w, T1‐weighted; HCV, hippocampal volume; PeriVent, global periventricular; PV, periventricular; D, deep; Front, frontal; Temp, temporal; Parie, parietal; Occ, occipital; uncorr, uncorrected; FDR, false discovery rate; GRS, genetic risk score; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; BaMoS, Bayesian model selection; LEAP, learning embeddings for atlas propagation.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Association (n = 776) of global and pathway GRSs with rs‐fMRI derived phenotypes. Top panel: rs‐fMRI–derived phenotypes are computed as the mean within network functional connectivity in three subsystems of the DMN defined as dorsal DMN (yellow), medial DMN (orange), and ventral DMN (red). Bottom panel: the heatmap shows β coefficients (colors) and p‐values (circles) of linear models with global (GRSnoAPOE) and pathway‐GRSs predicting rs‐fMRI–derived phenotypes. DMN, default mode network; GRS, genetic risk score; Uncorr, uncorrected; FDR, false discovery rate; rs‐fMRI, resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Association (n = 790) of global and pathway‐GRSs with DWI‐derived phenotypes. Left panel: DWI‐derived phenotypes are computed through TBSS pipeline as mean FA and MD within 10 regions of interest including commissural (genu, body, and splenium of CC), limbic (fornix and cingulum), associative (superior longitudinal, fronto‐occipital and inferior longitudinal fasciculi), and projection (corona radiata and internal capsule) white matter tracts. Right panel: the heatmap shows β coefficients (colors) and p values (circles) of linear models with global (GRSnoAPOE) and pathway‐GRSs predicting DWI‐derived phenotypes. CC, corpus callosum; Sup‐Long(SL), superior longitudinal; Front‐Occ(SFO), fronto‐occipital; Inf‐Long(IL), inferior longitudinal; Fasc, fasciculus; Uncorr, uncorrected; FDR, false discovery rate; DWI, diffusion‐weighted imaging; TBSS, tract‐based spatial statistics; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; GRS, genetic risk score.

References

    1. Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen IE, et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nat Genet. 2022;54:412‐436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sims R, Hill M, Williams J. The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:311‐322. - PubMed
    1. Ferreira D, Nordberg A, Westman E. Biological subtypes of Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neurology. 2020;94:436‐448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dong A, Toledo JB, Honnorat N, et al. Heterogeneity of neuroanatomical patterns in prodromal Alzheimer's disease: links to cognition, progression and biomarkers. Brain. 2017;140:735‐747. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MMB, et al. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2016;388:505‐517. - PubMed