Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):209.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02589-x.

Creating a health informatics data resource for hearing health research

Affiliations

Creating a health informatics data resource for hearing health research

Nishchay Mehta et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Erratum in

  • Correction: Creating a health informatics data resource for hearing health research.
    Mehta N, Ribeyre BB, Dimitrov L, English LJ, Ewart C, Heinrich A, Joshi N, Munro KJ, Roadknight G, Romao L, Schilder AG, Spriggs RV, Norris R, Ross T, Tilston G. Mehta N, et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02632-x. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39160523 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: The National Institute of Health and Social Care Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Collaborative (HIC) for Hearing Health has been established in the UK to curate routinely collected hearing health data to address research questions. This study defines priority research areas, outlines its aims, governance structure and demonstrates how hearing health data have been integrated into a common data model using pure tone audiometry (PTA) as a case study.

Methods: After identifying key research aims in hearing health, the governance structure for the NIHR HIC for Hearing Health is described. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) was chosen as our common data model to provide a case study example.

Results: The NIHR HIC Hearing Health theme have developed a data architecture outlying the flow of data from all of the various siloed electronic patient record systems to allow the effective linkage of data from electronic patient record systems to research systems. Using PTAs as an example, OMOPification of hearing health data successfully collated a rich breadth of datapoints across multiple centres.

Conclusion: This study identified priority research areas where routinely collected hearing health data could be useful. It demonstrates integration and standardisation of such data into a common data model from multiple centres. By describing the process of data sharing across the HIC, we hope to invite more centres to contribute and utilise data to address research questions in hearing health. This national initiative has the power to transform UK hearing research and hearing care using routinely collected clinical data.

Keywords: Data sharing; Database; Hearing health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process of requesting approval to use NIHR HIC Hearing Health data for research
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Local databases for auditory assessment (green) and hearing aid fitting (blue) and patient management (orange) all need to be combined in a meaningful way
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of linking structure of codes using fact relationships
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The different stages of data standardisation and integration from different types of data across a variety of platforms and providers within the field of hearing health research. There are two main steps:1. Step 1: generate local view of the uploaded CSV files for the sites to inspect and ensures it has been possible to load data into the database2. Step 2: updates and merges site’s existing data with newly ingested data, ensuring there are valid foreign keys (a system of connecting different tables of data), duplicates have been removed and deletions and updates have been processed to obtain the latest local version of a site’s data

References

    1. Royal National Institute for the Deaf. Facts and figures - RNID. https://rnid.org.uk/about-us/research-and-policy/facts-and-figures/ (accessed 12 Apr 2023).
    1. Office of National Statistics. 2011 censuses UK comparability report. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/planningforcensus2021/ukcensusdata (accessed 12 Apr 2023).
    1. Shield B. Hearing Loss-Numbers and Costs EVALUATION OF THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT A report for Hear-It AISBL. 2019.
    1. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Relationships among behavioral, environmental, and affective communication variables: a canonical analysis of the CPHI. J Speech Hear Disorders. 1989;54:180–8. 10.1044/jshd.5402.180. 10.1044/jshd.5402.180 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meadow-Orlans KP. Social and psychological effects of hearing loss in adulthood: a literature review. Adjustment Adult Hear loss 1985;:35–57.

LinkOut - more resources