Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 3;11(7):240189.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.240189. eCollection 2024 Jul.

The role of male quality in sequential mate choice: pregnancy replacement in small mammals?

Affiliations

The role of male quality in sequential mate choice: pregnancy replacement in small mammals?

Lea Vodjerek et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

Females mainly increase their reproductive success by improving the quality of their mates and need to be discriminative in their mate choices. Here, we investigate whether female mammals can trade up sire quality in sequential mate choice during already progressed pregnancies. A male-induced pregnancy termination (functional 'Bruce effect') could thus have an adaptive function in mate choice as a functional part of a pregnancy replacement. We used bank voles (Myodes glareolus) as a model system and exchanged the breeding male in the early second trimester of a potential pregnancy. Male quality was determined using urine marking values. Females were offered a sequence of either high- then low-quality male (HL) or a low- then high-quality male (LH). The majority of females bred with high-quality males independent of their position in the sequence, which may indicate a pregnancy replacement in LH but not in HL. The body size of the second male, which could have been related to the coercion of females by males into remating, did not explain late pregnancies. Thus, pregnancy replacement, often discussed as a counterstrategy to infanticide, may constitute adaptive mate choice in female mammals, and female choice may induce pregnancy replacement in mammals.

Keywords: male quality; pregnancy replacement; pregnancy termination; sequential mate choice; sexual selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Birthday, total number and distribution of bank vole litters across experimental days 18–30 with sequential mate choice.
Figure 1.
Birthday, total number and distribution of bank vole litters across experimental days 18–30 with sequential mate choice. Females were introduced to the first male at day 0. The first male was removed after 5–8 days (mean 7 ± 1 day) and replaced by the second male. Litters were assigned to males based on birth date, more than18 days after the introduction of the respective male (bank vole pregnancy lasting 20 ± 2 days [73], dataset 2), and by genetic paternity assignment during the critical period (days 25–29, dataset 1). Births are colour coded by assignment and dataset.
The number of bank vole litters sired by the first and second males in a sequential mating treatment
Figure 2.
The number of bank vole litters sired by the first and second males in a sequential mating treatment, where each male stayed with the female for one week. Males differed in quality (HL = high–low quality; HH = high–high quality; LH = low–high quality), and delivery of litters sired by the second male probably included a pregnancy replacement, indicating mate choice. Births are colour coded by assignment and dataset.

References

    1. Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 (ed. Campbell B), p. 136. London, UK: Heinemann. (10.4324/9781315129266) - DOI
    1. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (10.1515/9780691207278). See https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780691207278/html. - DOI - DOI
    1. Williams GC. 1966. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am. Nat. 100, 687–690. (10.1086/282461) - DOI
    1. Borgia G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (eds Blum MS, Blum NA), pp. 19–80. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    1. Halliday TR. 1983. The study of mate choice. In Mate choice (ed. Bateson P), p. 462. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

LinkOut - more resources