Clinical Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared with Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure Requiring Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39076431
- PMCID: PMC11262433
- DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2411312
Clinical Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared with Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure Requiring Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Biventricular pacing (BVP) is recommended for patients with heart failure (HF) who require cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel pacing strategy that appears to ensure better electrical and mechanical synchrony in these patients. Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyze the existing evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of LBBAP-CRT compared with BVP-CRT.
Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases were searched for studies comparing LBBAP-CRT with BVP-CRT. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improvement. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with participants that had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40% and (i) symptomatic HF or (ii) expected ventricular pacing 40%. Random and fixed effects models pairwise meta-analysis was conducted. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 assessment tool (ROB 2.0) and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) were used to assess the quality of the studies.
Results: Eleven studies (10 observational studies and 1 RCT) with 3141 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with BVP-CRT, LBBAP-CRT was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR): 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.87; p = 0.001), lower risk of HFH (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.71; p 0.00001) and more improvement in NYHA class (weighed mean difference (WMD): -0.36, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.13; p 0.00001) compared with patients who received BVP-CRT.
Conclusions: Compared with BVP-CRT, receipt of LBBAP-CRT in patients with HF is associated with a lower risk of mortality, and HFH and greater improvement in NHYA class.
Keywords: left bundle branch area pacing; meta-analysis; resynchronization.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. European Heart Journal . 2021;42:3427–3520. - PubMed
-
- Cleland JGF, Daubert J, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine . 2005;352:1539–1549. - PubMed
-
- Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Klein HU, Cannom DS, Brown MW, Dan A, et al. Survival with Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine . 2014;370:1694–1701. - PubMed
-
- Zhang S, Shan Q. Discussion of LBBP Synchronization Effects in HF Patients with LBBB and Comparison with BiV-CRT. Heart Failure Reviews . 2022;27:2181–2186. - PubMed
-
- Archontakis S, Sideris K, Laina A, Arsenos P, Paraskevopoulou D, Tyrovola D, et al. His Bundle Pacing: a Promising Alternative Strategy for Anti-bradycardic Pacing – report of a Single-center Experience. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology . 2022;64:77–86. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials