Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
- PMID: 39076918
- PMCID: PMC11266756
- DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2307237
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
Abstract
Objective: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with a high rate of mortality and disabling morbidity. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is seldom considered in this setting due to the fear of peri-operative complications. Here, we analysed the outcome of CS patients undergoing CABG within 48 hours after diagnosed with AMI.
Methods: A single-center, retrospective data analysis was performed in 220 AMI patients with CS that underwent CABG within 48 hours between 01/2001 and 01/2018.
Results: 141 patients were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 79 with non-STEMI (NSTEMI). Median age was 67 (60; 72) for STEMI, and 68 (60.8; 75.0) years for NSTEMI patients (p = 0.190). 52.5% of STEMI patients and 39.2% of NSTEMI patients had suffered from cardiac arrest (CA) pre-operatively (p = 0.049). Coronary 3-vessel disease was present in most patients (78.0% STEMI vs 83.5% NSTEMI; p = 0.381). Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were performed in 32.6% STEMI and 27.8% NSTEMI patients (p = 0.543) prior to surgery. Time from diagnosis to surgery was shorter in STEMI patients (3.92 (2.67; 5.98) vs 7.50 (4.78; 16.74) hours; p 0.001). A complete revascularization was achieved in 82.3% of STEMI and 73.4% of NSTEMI cases (p = 0.116). Post-operative low cardiac output occurred in 14.2% of STEMI vs 8.9% of NSTEMI patients (p = 0.289). The rate of cerebrovascular injury-including hypoxic brain damage was 12.1% for STEMI and 10.1% among NSTEMI patients. (p = 0.825). 30-day mortality was 32.6% after STEMI vs 31.6% in NSTEMI cases (p = 0.285).
Conclusions: In contrast to the discouraging data concerning the role of PCI in AMI patients with CS and complex coronary artery disease, CABG may represent a treatment option worth considering.
Keywords: CABG; acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, Fuernau G, de Waha S, Meyer-Saraei R, et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine . 2017;377:2419–2432. - PubMed
-
- Lawler PR, Silver DA, Scirica BM, Couper GS, Weinhouse GL, Camp PC. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults with Cardiogenic Shock. Circulation . 2015;131:676–680. - PubMed
-
- Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Bauersachs J, Dendale P, Edvardsen T, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal . 2021;42:1289–1367. - PubMed
-
- Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal . 2017;70:1082. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
