Application and Measurement Properties of the Talk Test in Cardiopulmonary Patients: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39076925
- PMCID: PMC11266803
- DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2307225
Application and Measurement Properties of the Talk Test in Cardiopulmonary Patients: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: The talk test (TT) evaluates the exercise intensity by measuring speech comfort level during aerobic exercise. There are several application protocols available to assess individuals with cardiopulmonary diseases. However, the measurement properties of the TT were not systematically reviewed yet.
Methods: A systematic review was developed, registered (CRD420181068930), and reported according to PRISMA Statement. Randomized clinical trials, cross-sectional studies, or series cases were identified through multiple databases and were selected if they presented concomitant speech provocation and an exercise test. Included studies were evaluated based on methodological quality (adapted New Castle-Ottawa Scale), descriptive quality (STROBE Statement), and risk of bias (COSMIN bias risk scale).
Results: Ten studies were included. Seven studies presented moderate to high quality and the majority presented good scores according to the STROBE statement. Four hundred and fourteen subjects performed the TT, the majority being patients with coronary artery disease. The test validity was supported by the included studies. Talk Test reliability was considered satisfactory, although only one study presented an adequate reliability analysis. The studies found a correlation between the last positive stage of the TT with the first ventilatory threshold. Workload, oxygen uptake, and heart rate in the last positive stage of the TT were not different from the same parameters related to the first ventilatory threshold.
Conclusions: The evidence indicates that the TT is suitable as an alternative tool for the assessment and prescription of exercise in individuals with cardiovascular diseases. The stage when the individual is still able to speak comfortably is suggested as the intensity for aerobic exercise prescription. As there is still no well-defined and fully explored TT protocol, caution is required when interpreting the TT results.
Keywords: cardiorespiratory evaluation; exercise test; heart diseases; validity.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Pelliccia A, Sharma S, Gati S, Bäck M, Börjesson M, Caselli S, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. European Heart Journal . 2021;42:17–96. - PubMed
-
- Sandercock GRH, Cardoso F, Almodhy M, Pepera G. Cardiorespiratory fitness changes in patients receiving comprehensive outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in the UK: a multicentre study. Heart . 2013;99:785–790. - PubMed
-
- Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després J, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: a Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation . 2016;134:e653–e699. - PubMed
-
- Mezzani A, Hamm LF, Jones AM, McBride PE, Moholdt T, Stone JA, et al. Aerobic Exercise Intensity Assessment and Prescription in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention . 2012;32:327–350. - PubMed
-
- Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales . Human Kinetics; USA: 1998.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
