Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 24;23(7):233.
doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2307233. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Efficacy and Safety of a Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane Wrapped a Single Layer of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in a Porcine Coronary Perforation Model

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of a Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane Wrapped a Single Layer of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in a Porcine Coronary Perforation Model

Yi Liu et al. Rev Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Covered stents are effective in treating coronary artery perforation (CAP), however, the high rate of immediate device deployment failure and in-stent restenosis have limited the application of the currently covered stents.

Methods: We designed a covered stent system consisting of a single layer of drug-eluting stent and a layer of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane wrapped at the outer layer of the stent. The immediate sealing effect of our novel covered stent was observed by using an Ellis type III CAP model. The device's success was defined as its ability to seal the perforation, assessed by visual estimation and final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow. The antiproliferative effect was evaluated in 12 swine, which were randomly assigned to treatment (sirolimus-eluting covered stents) and control (bare metal covered stents) groups. Coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at index procedure, 1- and 6-month after stent implantation. All swine were sacrificed for histopathological analyses at 6-month.

Results: The device success rate was 100%. All swine were alive at 6-month follow-up. At 1-month, the treatment group had a larger minimal luminal diameter (MLD) (1.89 ± 0.29 mm vs. 0.63 ± 0.65 mm, p = 0.004) and lower late luminal loss (LLL) (0.47 ± 0.15 mm vs. 1.80 ± 0.34 mm, p < 0.001) compared with control group. At 6-month, the treatment group had a numerically higher MLD (0.94 ± 0.75 mm vs. 0.26 ± 0.46 mm; p = 0.230) and lower LLL (1.43 ± 0.85 mm vs. 2.17 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.215) compared with control group. Histological analyses revealed the mean plaque area was lower in the treatment group (2.99 ± 0.81 mm 2 vs. 4.29 ± 0.77 mm 2 , p = 0.035) than in the control group. No in-stent thrombosis was observed in either group.

Conclusions: In the porcine model of coronary perforation, the PTFE membrane wrapped sirolimus-eluting stent showed a high device success rate in sealing the perforation. The drug-eluting covered stent demonstrated a relatively sustained antiproliferative effect up to 6 months post-implantation.

Keywords: coronary artery perforation; covered stent; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yinyi (Liaoning) Biotech Co., Ltd (Dalian, China) kindly assisted us on the design and production of the novel covered stent. We declare that Yinyi (Liaoning) Biotech Co., Ltd had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The flow chart of the study. CAG, Coronary angiography; CAP, coronary perforation; ISR, in-stent restenosis; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PCI, percutaneous coronary interventions.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The representative example of CAP model and covered stent implantation. (A) Baseline CAG. (B) Construction of CAP model (B1, micro-catheter, B2, soft guidewire, B3, stiff guidewire). (C) Streaming of contrast through an exit hole (white arrow). (D) Stent positioning. (E) Stent dilation. (F) Complete closure of the perforation. CAP, coronary perforation; CAG, Coronary angiography.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Representative examples of CAG follow-up at all time points. Two swine died of anesthetic accident in the control group. The CAG data was not available in 1 swine from the control group and 2 swine from the treatment group, respectively. CAG, Coronary angiography.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Representative examples of OCT follow-up at all time points. OCT, Optical Coherence Tomography.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Representative examples of histological follow-up. *p < 0.05 Treatment group (n = 6) vs. Control group (n = 4).

References

    1. Harnek J, James S, Lagerqvist B. Coronary Artery Perforation and Tamponade—Incidence, Risk Factors, Predictors and Outcomes from 12 Years’ Data of the SCAAR Registry. Circulation Journal . 2019;84:43–53. - PubMed
    1. Parikh P, Banerjee K, Sammour Y, Ali AF, Sankaramangalam K, Nair R, et al. Utilization and outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene covered stents in patients with coronary artery perforation and coronary artery aneurysm: Single center 15-year experience. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions . 2019;94:555–561. - PubMed
    1. Pavani M, Cerrato E, Latib A, Ryan N, Calcagno S, Rolfo C, et al. Acute and long-term outcomes after polytetrafluoroethylene or pericardium covered stenting for grade 3 coronary artery perforations: Insights from G3-CAP registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions . 2018;92:1247–1255. - PubMed
    1. Dogu Kilic I, Fabris E, Serdoz R, Caiazzo G, Foin N, Abou-Sherif S, et al. Coronary covered stents. EuroIntervention . 2016;12:1288–1295. - PubMed
    1. Al-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, Godino C, Ferraro M, Mussardo M, et al. Incidence, Predictors, Management, Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes Following Grade III Coronary Perforation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions . 2011;4:87–95. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources