Different Techniques of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Their Efficacy: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39077542
- PMCID: PMC11264098
- DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2406184
Different Techniques of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Their Efficacy: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation has been identified as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events. Since 1948 different surgical techniques have described the feasibility and the rationale of left atrial surgical appendage closure. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the reported patency rates of different surgical techniques.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent investigators searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OVID® (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands) to identify relevant studies. Consecutively, a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) strategy assessment of literature was performed to search eventual other relevant studies that may have been ignored.
Results: A total of 42 studies were included in our analysis. The total number of patients who underwent surgical left atrial appendage closure was 5671, and in 61.2% an imaging follow up was performed, mostly with transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation. Success rate for the different techniques was: Clip deployment 98%; Lariat procedure 88%; Surgical amputation 91%; Endocardial suture 74.3%, Epicardial suture 65%; Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) ligation 60.9%; Stapler technique with excision of left atrial appendage (LAA) 100%; Stapler without excision 70%.
Conclusions: To date, data on surgical left atrial appendage closure are poor and not standardized, even if reported rates are acceptable and comparable to transcatheter procedures. If validated on large-scale non-retrospective and multicentric studies, these promising developments may offer a valuable alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ineligible for oral anticoagulation therapy.
Keywords: LAAC; atrial fibrillation; left atrial appendage; left atrial appendage closure; surgical closure.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Mariangela Peruzzi is serving as Guest Editor of this journal. We declare that Mariangela Peruzzi had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Buddhadeb Dawn.
Figures





References
-
- Johnson WD, Ganjoo AK, Stone CD, Srivyas RC, Howard M. The left atrial appendage: our most lethal human attachment! Surgical implications. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery . 2000;17:718–722. - PubMed
-
- Hanke T. Surgical management of the left atrial appendage: a must or a myth? European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery . 2018;53:i33–i38. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources