Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 15:11:1352196.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196. eCollection 2024.

TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how?

Affiliations
Review

TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how?

Angelo Iossa et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Groin hernia repair is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons. The open mesh technique generally represents the main technique for an inguinal repair, but a different approach is often required. Laparoscopy was found to be the answer to minimizing the impact of the preperitoneal open techniques described by Nyhus and Stoppa. The introduction of the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) in the early 1990s started a new chapter in groin hernia surgery. The minimally invasive techniques vs. open mesh, and then one against the other, soon became a hot topic among abdominal wall surgeons. With time, the number of procedures and indications increased and are still increasing. This review aims to provide an overview of the two main laparoscopic techniques for groin hernia repair, answering the following questions: Who should perform them? What is the learning curve required to minimize complications and optimize operative time? When is a minimally invasive approach indicated, and which one (both in elective and in emergency setting)? How are they performed? The standard techniques have been described in detail, and personal observations from an abdominal wall surgery referral center were added. The main reviews from the early 2000s up to date, which compared the techniques, were analyzed, and the results reported, confirming the comparable safety and efficacy of both these techniques.

Keywords: TAPP; TEP; laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia surgery; laparoscopic groin hernia repair; review of literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TAPP trocar disposition and inguinal dissection view before the mesh placement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
TEP trocar disposition and inguinal dissection view before the mesh placement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Decisional flowchart on elective groin hernia management.

References

    1. Ger R. The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. (1982) 64:342–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Yucel O, Nagan RF. Laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach: a preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc. (1992) 2:53–8. - PubMed
    1. Dulucq JL. Traitement des hernies de l’aine par mise en place d’un patch prothétique sous-péritonéal en rétropéritonéoscopie. Cahiers Chir. (1991) 79:15–6. - PubMed
    1. McKernan BJ, Laws HL. Laparoscopic preperitoneal prosthetic repair of inguinal hernias. Surg Rounds. (1992) 15:579–610.
    1. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ. Laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair without peritoneal incision technique and early clinical results. Surg Endosc. (1993) 7:159–62. 10.1007/BF00594098 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources