Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T2 Colorectal Cancer
- PMID: 39077765
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006469
Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T2 Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
Objective: To develop and externally validate an updated artificial intelligence (AI) prediction system for stratifying the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T2 colorectal cancer (CRC).
Background: Recent technical advances allow complete local excision of T2 CRC, traditionally treated with surgical resection. Yet, the widespread adoption of this approach is hampered by the inability to stratify the risk of LNM.
Methods: Data from patients with pT2 CRC undergoing surgical resection between April 2000 and May 2022 at one Japanese and one Italian center were analyzed. Primary goal was AI system development for accurate LNM prediction. Predictors encompassed 7 variables: age, sex, tumor size, tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, histologic differentiation, and carcinoembryonic antigen level. The tool's discriminating power was assessed through area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results: Out of 735 initial patients, 692 were eligible. Training and validation cohorts comprised of 492 and 200 patients, respectively. The AI model displayed an area under the curve of 0.75 in the combined validation data set. Sensitivity for LNM prediction was 97.8%, and specificity was 15.6%. The positive and the negative predictive value were 25.7% and 96%, respectively. The false negative rate was 2.2%, and the false positive was 84.4%.
Conclusions: Our AI model, based on easily accessible clinical and pathologic variables, moderately predicts LNM in T2 CRC. However, the risk of false negative needs to be considered. The training of the model including more patients across western and eastern centers - differentiating between colon and rectal cancers - may improve its performance and accuracy.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, Hathorn KE, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for treatment of rectal tumors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1688–1695.
-
- Sagae VMT, Ribeiro IB, de Moura DTH, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of early rectal tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1025–1034.
-
- Ichimasa K, Kudo SE, Miyachi H, et al. Risk stratification of T1 colorectal cancer metastasis to lymph nodes: current status and perspective. Gut Liver. 2021;15:818–826.
-
- Argiles G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, et al. Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1291–1305.
-
- Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:1–42.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
