CM-Pf deep brain stimulation in polyneuromodulation for epilepsy
- PMID: 39078093
- DOI: 10.1002/epd2.20255
CM-Pf deep brain stimulation in polyneuromodulation for epilepsy
Abstract
Objective: Neuromodulation is a viable option for patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. We reviewed the management of patients with two deep brain neurostimulators. In addition, patients implanted with a device targeting the centromedian-parafascicular (CM-Pf) nuclear complex supplements this report to provide an illustrative case to implantation and programming a patient with three active devices.
Methods: A narrative review using PubMed and Embase identified patients with drug-resistant epilepsy implanted with more than one neurostimulator was performed. Combinations of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were identified. We provide a background of a newly reported case of an adult with a triple implant eventually responding to CM-Pf DBS as the third implant following suboptimal benefit from VNS and RNS.
Results: In review of the literature, dual-device therapy is increasing in reports of use with combinations of VNS, RNS, and DBS to treat patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We review dual-device implants with thalamic DBS device combinations, functional neural networks, and programming patients with dual devices. CM-Pf is a new target for DBS and has shown a variable response in focal epilepsy. We report the unique case of 28-year-old male with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who experienced a 75% seizure reduction with CM-Pf DBS as his third device after suboptimal responses to VNS and RNS. After 9 months, he also experienced seizure freedom from recurrent focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. No medical or surgical complications or safety issues were encountered.
Conclusion: We demonstrate safety and feasibility in an adult combining active VNS, RNS, and CM-Pf DBS. Patients with dual-device therapy who experience a suboptimal response to initial device use at optimized settings should not be considered a neuromodulation "failure." Strategies to combine devices require a working knowledge of brain networks.
Keywords: centromedian‐parafascicularis; deep brain stimulation; devices; drug resistance; epilepsy; neuromodulation; neurostimulators; seizures; surgery; thalamus.
© 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Chen Z, Brodie MJ, Liew D, Kwan P. Treatment outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy treated with established and new antiepileptic drugs: a 30‐year longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:279–286.
-
- Burdette D, Mirro EA, Lawrence M, Patra SE. Brain‐responsive corticothalamic stimulation in the pulvinar nucleus for the treatment of regional neocortical epilepsy: a case series. Epilepsia Open. 2021;6:611–617.
-
- Davis P, Gaitanis J. Neuromodulation for the treatment of epilepsy: a review of current approaches and future directions. Clin Ther. 2020;42(7):1140–1154.
-
- Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:899–908.
-
- Ilyas A, Pizarro D, Romeo AK, Riley KO, Pati S. The centromedian nucleus: anatomy, physiology, and clinical implications. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;63:1–7.