Patch tests in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Late readings on Day 4 is more sensitive than on Day 3
- PMID: 39078104
- DOI: 10.1111/cod.14654
Patch tests in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Late readings on Day 4 is more sensitive than on Day 3
Abstract
Background: Patch tests (PTs) are recommended to identify the culprit drug in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (NICADRs). We recently reported that, in patients with NICADRs, a unique reading of PTs at day (D)2 compared with an additional second late reading at D4 missed almost half (45.3%) of the positive PTs.
Objectives: To assess the change in sensitivity of the PT reading on D4 compared with the reading on D3.
Methods: We performed a retrospective (July 2020-June 2023) monocentric study of patients who had PTs with two readings for a NICADR. We compared reading on D3 and the second reading on D4 for the suspected drug (primary outcome) and for the related drugs tested simultaneously (secondary outcome).
Results: During the study period, 249 patients underwent patch testing with D3 and D4 readings. Regarding the primary outcome, the first reading at D3 was positive for 13.7% of patients, and the reading at D4 for 24.9% of patients (p < 0.0001). Regarding the secondary outcome, only 9.6% of patients had all their positive PT at D3 compared with 24.9% of patients at D4 (p < 0.0001). Considering the evaluated drug classes, no statistical difference was observed. However, we highlight that D3 reading detected all positive carbamazepine PTs (n = 3) while positive clindamycin PTs (n = 4) were identified only with the help of the second reading on D4.
Conclusion: This study showed that, an additional D4 reading compared with a single D3 reading enhanced the sensitivity of PTs to identify culprit drugs and related. Further studies should replicate these findings and evaluate the medico-economic balance and safety of a single reading of PTs on D4.
Keywords: adverse drug reactions; cross‐reactions; epidemiology; patch tests.
© 2024 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bhujoo Z, Ingen‐Housz‐Oro S, Gener G, et al. Patch tests in nonimmediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions: the importance of late readings on day 4. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86(1):29‐33.
-
- Brockow K, Ardern‐Jones M, Mockenhaupt M, et al. EAACI position paper on how to classify cutaneous manifestations of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy. 2019;74(1):14‐27.
-
- Kardaun SH, Kuiper H, Fidler V, Jonkman MF. The histopathological spectrum of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and its differentiation from generalized pustular psoriasis. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37(12):1220‐1229.
-
- Sidoroff A, Halevy S, Bavinck JNB, Vaillant L, Roujeau JC. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) – a clinical reaction pattern: acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28(3):113‐119.
-
- Arimone Y, Bidault I, Dutertre JP, et al. Updating the French method for the causality assessment of adverse drug reactions. Therapie. 2013;68(2):69‐76.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
