Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424310.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24310.

Self-Managed Abortion Attempts Before vs After Changes in Federal Abortion Protections in the US

Affiliations

Self-Managed Abortion Attempts Before vs After Changes in Federal Abortion Protections in the US

Lauren Ralph et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: With decreasing access to facility-based abortion in the US, an increase in self-managed abortion (SMA) using various methods is anticipated. To date, no studies have examined changes in SMA in the shifting policy landscape.

Objective: To estimate changes in SMA prevalence among the general US population from before to after the Supreme Court's June 2022 decision overturning federal abortion protections.

Design, setting, and participants: Serial cross-sectional surveys were administered throughout the US from December 10, 2021, to January 11, 2022, and June 14 to July 7, 2023. Participants included online panel members assigned female sex at birth, ages 18 to 49 years (or ages 15-17 years if a household member), who were English- or Spanish-speaking.

Exposure: Year of the survey (2021-2022 vs 2023).

Main outcome and measures: Participants were asked whether they had "ever taken or done something on their own, without medical assistance, to try to end a pregnancy" and, if so, details of their experience. Changes in the weighted SMA prevalence between survey years were examined, factors associated with SMA experience were identified, and projected lifetime SMA prevalence was calculated using discrete-time event history models, accounting for abortion underreporting.

Results: Median age of the participants was 32.5 (IQR, 25-41) years in 2021-2022 (n = 7016) and 32.0 (IQR, 24-40) in 2023 (n = 7148). Across both years, approximately 14% were non-Hispanic Black, 21% were Hispanic, and 54% were non-Hispanic White. The weighted adjusted proportion that ever attempted SMA was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.0%) in 2021-2022 and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-4.0%) in 2023-an increase of 1.0% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.7%; P = .03). Projected lifetime SMA prevalence accounting for abortion underreporting was 10.7% (95% CI, 8.6%-12.8%). In adjusted analyses, SMA experience was higher among non-Hispanic Black (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.8%-5.8%) vs other racial and ethnic (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.2%-3.1%) groups (P = .04) and sexual and gender minority (5.0%; 95% CI, 3.4%-6.6%) vs heterosexual or cisgender (2.5%; 95% CI, 2.0%-2.9%) participants (P < .001). Approximately 4 in 10 (45.3% in 2021 and 39.0% in 2023) SMA attempts occurred before age 20 years. The methods used included herbs (29.8% [2021-2022] vs 25.9% [2023]), physical methods (28.6% [2021-2022] vs 29.7% [2023]), or alcohol or other substances (17.9% [2021-2022] vs 18.6% [2023]). Few participants (7.1% [2021-2022] vs 4.7% [2023]) sought emergency care for a complication.

Conclusions and relevance: In this serial nationally representative survey study, increased SMA was observed following the loss of federal abortion protections. The findings revealed increased SMA use among marginalized groups, most often with ineffective methods. These findings suggest the need to expand access to alternative models of safe and effective abortion care and ensure those seeking health care post-SMA do not face legal risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ralph reported receiving grants from the Anonymous Foundation during the conduct of the study. Dr Grossman reported receiving grants from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the DeMartini Family Foundation, and from the Anonymous Foundation during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from the Lawyering Project and Planned Parenthood Federation of America for serving as an expert witness in cases challenging abortion restrictions. Dr Biggs reported receiving grants from Anonymous Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and William and Flora Hewlett Foundation during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Center for Reproductive Rights and the ACLU to serve as an expert witness in cases challenging abortion restrictions outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Adjusted and Weighted Estimates of the Prevalence of Attempts to Self-Manage Abortion (SMA) by Sociodemographic Characteristics, 2023
Findings shown for 7028 participants. Values represent estimated proportion who ever attempted SMA from a weighted logistic regression model, with SMA as the dependent variable and race and ethnicity; place of birth; lesbian, gay, transgender, queer, or nonbinary/gender nonconforming identity (LGBTQ); and perceived socioeconomic status of household during adolescence as independent variables. Except for the categories Not Hispanic and Hispanic, all participants in the race and ethnicity categories were considered non-Hispanic. aSignificant at P < .05 from a binary contrast comparing everyone in a given subgroup with everyone not in that subgroup.

Comment in

References

    1. McCann A, Schoenfeld Walker A. Abortion bans across the country: tracking restrictions by state. The New York Times. June 24, 2024. Accessed December 15, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html
    1. Society of Family Planning . #WeCount Report April 2022 to June 2023. May 14, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2024. https://societyfp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/WeCount-report-6-May-20...
    1. Dench D, Pineda-Torres M, Myers C. The effects of the Dobbs decision on fertility. Institute of Labor Economics. November 2003. Accessed December 15, 2023. https://docs.iza.org/dp16608.pdf
    1. Bell SO, Stuart EA, Gemmill A. Texas’ 2021 ban on abortion in early pregnancy and changes in live births. JAMA. 2023;330(3):281-282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verma N, Grossman D. Self-managed abortion in the United States. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2023;12(2):70-75. doi: 10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms