Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2423544.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23544.

Medication Optimization Protocol Efficacy for Geriatric Inpatients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Medication Optimization Protocol Efficacy for Geriatric Inpatients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Kenya Ie et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Figure 1.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2449465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49465. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39531239 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: There is currently no consensus on clinically effective interventions for polypharmacy among older inpatients.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary team-based medication optimization on survival, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization in older inpatients with polypharmacy.

Design, setting, and participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 internal medicine inpatient wards within a community hospital in Japan. Participants included medical inpatients 65 years or older who were receiving 5 or more regular medications. Enrollment took place between May 21, 2019, and March 14, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2023 to May 2024.

Intervention: The participants were randomly assigned to receive either an intervention for medication optimization or usual care including medication reconciliation. The intervention consisted of a medication review using the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria, followed by a medication optimization proposal for participants and their attending physicians developed by a multidisciplinary team. On discharge, the medication optimization summary was sent to patients' primary care physicians and community pharmacists.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the number of prescribed medications, falls, and adverse events.

Results: Between May 21, 2019, and March 14, 2022, 442 participants (mean [SD] age, 81.8 [7.1] years; 223 [50.5%] women) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 215) and usual care (n = 227). The intervention group had a significantly lower percentage of patients with 1 or more potentially inappropriate medications than the usual care group at discharge (26.2% vs 33.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.94]; P = .03), at 6 months (27.7% vs 37.5%; adjusted OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.86]; P = .01), and at 12 months (26.7% vs 37.4%; adjusted OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]; P = .007). The primary composite outcome occurred in 106 participants (49.3%) in the intervention group and 117 (51.5%) in the usual care group (stratified hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.75-1.27]). Adverse events were similar between each group (123 [57.2%] in the intervention group and 135 [59.5%] in the usual care group).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of older inpatients with polypharmacy, the multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention did not reduce death, unscheduled hospital visits, or rehospitalization within 12 months. The intervention was effective in reducing the number of medications with no significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes, even among older inpatients with polypharmacy.

Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000035265.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ie reported grants from Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Participants Through the Study
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Survival Plot of Time to Event for Participants in the Intervention Group and Usual Care Group
A, Primary composite outcome of all-cause death, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization. B, All-cause death. C, Unscheduled hospital visits; D, Rehospitalizations. Tick marks indicate censoring events.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Total Medication Counts and Potentially Inappropriate Medications Over Time
Each point represents the mean, and each error bar represents the 95% CI. Medications categorized as as needed were excluded from the medication counts.

Comment in

References

    1. Midão L, Giardini A, Menditto E, Kardas P, Costa E. Polypharmacy prevalence among older adults based on the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;78:213-220. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Young EH, Pan S, Yap AG, Reveles KR, Bhakta K. Polypharmacy prevalence in older adults seen in United States physician offices from 2009 to 2016. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255642. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255642 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rawle MJ, Cooper R, Kuh D, Richards M. Associations between polypharmacy and cognitive and physical capability: a British birth cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(5):916-923. doi:10.1111/jgs.15317 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liew TM, Lee CS, Goh Shawn KL, Chang ZY. Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older persons: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(3):257-266. doi:10.1370/afm.2373 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leelakanok N, Holcombe AL, Lund BC, Gu X, Schweizer ML. Association between polypharmacy and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017;57(6):729-738.e10. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2017.06.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data