Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 15;130(24):4257-4266.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.35489. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study

Francesca Palandri et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the therapy of myelofibrosis (MF) based on clinical trials including only intermediate2-high risk (INT2/HIGH) patients. However, RUX is commonly used in intermediate-1 (INT1) patients, with scarce information on responses and outcome.

Methods: The authors investigated the benefit of RUX in 1055 MF patients, included in the "RUX-MF" retrospective study.

Results: At baseline (BL), 595 (56.2%) patients were at INT1-risk according to DIPSS (PMF) or MYSEC-PM (SMF). The spleen was palpable at <5 cm, between 5 and 10 cm, and >10 cm below costal margin in 5.9%, 47.4%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively; 300 (54.1%) were highly symptomatic (total symptom score ≥20). High-molecular-risk (HMR) mutations (IDH1/2, ASXL-1, SRSF2, EZH2, U2AF1Q157) were detected in 77/167 patients. A total of 101 (19.2%) patients had ≥1 cytopenia (Hb < 10 g/dL: n.36; PLT <100 x 109/L: n = 43; white blood cells <4 x 109/L: n = 40). After 6 months on RUX, IWG-MRT-defined spleen and symptoms response rates were 26.8% and 67.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, predictors of SR at 6 months were no HMR mutations odds ratio [OR], 2.0, p = .05], no cytopenia (OR, 2.10; p = .01), and blasts <1% (OR, 1.91; p = .01). In multivariate analysis, absence of HMR maintained a significant association (OR, 2.1 [1.12-3.76]; p = .01).

Conclusions: In INT1 patients, responses were more frequent and durable, whereas toxicity rates were lower compared to INT2/high-risk patients. Presence of HMR mutations, cytopenia, and peripheral blasts identified less-responsive INT1 patients, who may benefit for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: DIPSS score; JAK2 mutation; intermediate‐1; myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Francesca Palandri reports consultancy and honoraria from Novartis, Celgene, AOP, Sierra Oncology, and CTI. Giulia Benevolo reports honoraria from Novartis, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, and BMS. Alessandra Iurlo reports honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, and Incyte. Massimo Breccia reports honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Incyte. Massimiliano Bonifacio reports honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, and Incyte. Monica Crugnola reports honoraria from Novartis and Amgen. Gianni Binotto reports honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, BMS‐Celgene, and Pfizer. Roberto M. Lemoli reports honoraria from Jazz, Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Sanofi, and StemLine. Fabrizio Pane reports honoraria from Incyte, Novartis, Jazz, BMS‐Celgene, Amgen, and Gilead. Michele Cavo acted as consultant and received honoraria from Jannsen, BMS Celgene, SanoFI, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, and Adaptive. Giuseppe A. Palumbo reports consultancy and honoraria from Abbvie, AOP, AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, GSK, Morphosys, and Novartis. Michele Cavo acted as consultant and received honoraria from Jannsen, BMS Celgene, SanoFI, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, and Adaptive.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Characteristics associated to spleen response at 6 months in intermediate‐1 patients.* *Using Pearson’s correlation test: white blood cell (WBC) count <25 x 109/L correlates with blasts <1%; platelet (PLT) count <100 x 109/L; and hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL correlate with no cytopenia. (a) Including high‐molecular risk (HMR) mutations; (b) excluding HMR mutations.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Overall survival (a) and event‐free survival (b) of intermediate‐1 (blue line) compared to intermediate‐2/high‐risk patients (red line).

References

    1. Harrison CN, Kiladjian JJ, Koschmieder S, Passamonti F. Myelofibrosis: current unmet needs, emerging treatments, and future perspectives. Cancer. 2024;130(12):2091‐2097. doi:10.1002/cncr.35244 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Passamonti F, Mora B. Myelofibrosis. Blood. 2023;141(16):1954‐1970. doi:10.1182/blood.2022017423 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: Mutation‐Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for transplantation‐age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(4):310‐318. doi:10.1200/jco.2017.76.4886 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113(13):2895‐2901. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG‐MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115(9):1703‐1708. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837 - DOI - PubMed