Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study
- PMID: 39078647
- PMCID: PMC11585342
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35489
Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study
Abstract
Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the therapy of myelofibrosis (MF) based on clinical trials including only intermediate2-high risk (INT2/HIGH) patients. However, RUX is commonly used in intermediate-1 (INT1) patients, with scarce information on responses and outcome.
Methods: The authors investigated the benefit of RUX in 1055 MF patients, included in the "RUX-MF" retrospective study.
Results: At baseline (BL), 595 (56.2%) patients were at INT1-risk according to DIPSS (PMF) or MYSEC-PM (SMF). The spleen was palpable at <5 cm, between 5 and 10 cm, and >10 cm below costal margin in 5.9%, 47.4%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively; 300 (54.1%) were highly symptomatic (total symptom score ≥20). High-molecular-risk (HMR) mutations (IDH1/2, ASXL-1, SRSF2, EZH2, U2AF1Q157) were detected in 77/167 patients. A total of 101 (19.2%) patients had ≥1 cytopenia (Hb < 10 g/dL: n.36; PLT <100 x 109/L: n = 43; white blood cells <4 x 109/L: n = 40). After 6 months on RUX, IWG-MRT-defined spleen and symptoms response rates were 26.8% and 67.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, predictors of SR at 6 months were no HMR mutations odds ratio [OR], 2.0, p = .05], no cytopenia (OR, 2.10; p = .01), and blasts <1% (OR, 1.91; p = .01). In multivariate analysis, absence of HMR maintained a significant association (OR, 2.1 [1.12-3.76]; p = .01).
Conclusions: In INT1 patients, responses were more frequent and durable, whereas toxicity rates were lower compared to INT2/high-risk patients. Presence of HMR mutations, cytopenia, and peripheral blasts identified less-responsive INT1 patients, who may benefit for alternative therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: DIPSS score; JAK2 mutation; intermediate‐1; myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib.
© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Francesca Palandri reports consultancy and honoraria from Novartis, Celgene, AOP, Sierra Oncology, and CTI. Giulia Benevolo reports honoraria from Novartis, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, and BMS. Alessandra Iurlo reports honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, and Incyte. Massimo Breccia reports honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Incyte. Massimiliano Bonifacio reports honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, and Incyte. Monica Crugnola reports honoraria from Novartis and Amgen. Gianni Binotto reports honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, BMS‐Celgene, and Pfizer. Roberto M. Lemoli reports honoraria from Jazz, Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Sanofi, and StemLine. Fabrizio Pane reports honoraria from Incyte, Novartis, Jazz, BMS‐Celgene, Amgen, and Gilead. Michele Cavo acted as consultant and received honoraria from Jannsen, BMS Celgene, SanoFI, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, and Adaptive. Giuseppe A. Palumbo reports consultancy and honoraria from Abbvie, AOP, AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, GSK, Morphosys, and Novartis. Michele Cavo acted as consultant and received honoraria from Jannsen, BMS Celgene, SanoFI, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, and Adaptive.
Figures
References
-
- Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG‐MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115(9):1703‐1708. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
