Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec 1;50(12):1149-1154.
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004308. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers: Jawline Injections Alone Versus Jawline and Cheek Injections

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers: Jawline Injections Alone Versus Jawline and Cheek Injections

Amy Forman Taub et al. Dermatol Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Jowling is a common aesthetic complaint in aging individuals.

Objective: Injectable filler placed at the lateral jawline will improve the appearance of jowls, as defined by the Merz Aesthetic Jawline Grading Scale (MAJGS). This improvement will be independent of concomitant injection of filler into the lateral cheek.

Methods: Fifteen female subjects with grade 2 to 3 jowls on a scale of 0 to 4 were enrolled to receive either VYC-20L in the mandibular angle/ramus (Group 1) or the mandibular angle/ramus and lateral cheek (Group 2). The subjects were evaluated by a blinded cosmetic dermatologist and themselves at 4 weeks after the last injection.

Results: A statistically significant improvement was noted in Group 1 by all blinded reviewers and subjects. Group 2 did not reach statistical significance as evaluated by the blinded dermatologist although did by the subject's rating. The average amount of filler injected per subject was 3.36 mL for group 1 and 8.38 mL for group 2. A novel adverse event was tenderness when chewing lasting for 2 to 3 days.

Conclusion: Injection of VYC-20L showed statistical improvement in a validated jowl scale when injected at the angle of the mandible and the mandibular ramus, independent of concomitant lateral cheek injections.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dayan SH, Arkins JP. The subliminal difference: treating from an evolutionary perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:189e–190e.
    1. Lorenc ZP, Lee JC. Composite volumization of the aging face: supra-periosteal space as the foundation for optimal facial rejuvenation. J Drugs Dermatol 2016;15:1136–41.
    1. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P050... . Accessed July 8, 2024.
    1. Dallara JM, Baspeyras M, Bui P, Cartier H, et al. Calcium hydroxylapatite for jawline rejuvenation: consensus recommendations. J Cosmet Dermatol 2014;13:3–14.
    1. How much skin will be removed at Facelift? [see comments].RealSelf 2016. Comment on RealSelf 2017; Shah,A. Available from: https://realself.com/question/budapest-skin-removed-facelift . Accessed July 8, 2024.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources