Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 30;22(8):e247036.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036.

Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study

Affiliations

Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study

Kristen K Curtis et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. .

Abstract

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials.

Methods: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale.

Results: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2.

Conclusions: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Friedman EB, Scolyer RA, Williams GJ, et al. Melanoma in situ: a critical review and re-evaluation of current excision margin recommendations. Adv Ther 2021;38:3506–3530. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma AN, Foulad DP, Doan L, et al. Mohs surgery for the treatment of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma – a systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat 2021;32:157–163. - PubMed
    1. Etzkorn JR, Sobanko JF, Elenitsas R, et al. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;72:840–850. - PubMed
    1. Swetter SM, Johnson D, Albertini MR, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Melanoma: Cutaneous. Version 1.2024. Accessed March 15, 2024. To view the most recent version, visit https://www.nccn.org
    1. Krausz AE, Higgins HW II, Etzkorn J, et al. Systematic review of technical variations for Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma. Dermatol Surg 2021;47:1539–1544. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources