Interleukin 23 versus interleukin 12/23 inhibitors on preventing incidental psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis? A real-world comparison from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network

Abstract

Background: Managing psoriasis (PsO) and its comorbidities, particularly psoriatic arthritis, often involves using interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12/23 inhibitors. However, the comparative risk of these treatments still needs to be explored.

Objective: This study evaluates the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis in patients treated with IL-23 inhibitors compared to IL-12/23 inhibitors.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX, including adult patients diagnosed with PsO. Patients with IL-23 or IL-12/23 inhibitors treatment were included and propensity score matched. The primary outcome was the incidence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), analyzed using a Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results: The study included matched cohorts of patients treated with IL-23 inhibitors (n = 2273) and IL-12/23 inhibitors (n = 2995). Cox regression analysis revealed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of PsA between the IL-23i and IL-12/23i cohorts (P = .812). Kaplan-Meier estimates confirmed similar cumulative incidences of arthropathic PsO in both cohorts over the study period.

Limitation: Long-term follow-up studies are required to understand more of the effects of these interleukin inhibitors.

Conclusion: No significant difference but a numerically lower risk of psoriatic arthritis in PsO patients treated with IL-23 inhibitors than with IL-12/23 inhibitors was found, underscoring their comparable efficacy in PsO management and follow-up.

Keywords: IL12/23 inhibitors; IL23 inhibitors; arthropathic psoriasis; biologic agents; psoriasis; retrospective cohort study; safety profile.