Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):913.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12696-7.

Evaluating PAX1 methylation for cervical cancer screening triage in non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women

Affiliations

Evaluating PAX1 methylation for cervical cancer screening triage in non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women

Meiyuan Huang et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: In China, the national cervical cancer screening protocol involves initial testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV), followed by cytology for hrHPV-positive cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) analysis in identifying precancerous or cancerous lesions in cervical samples from Chinese women positive for non-16/18 hrHPV strains.

Methods: Between February 2022 and March 2023, 281 cervical samples from non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women underwent cytological examination and PAX1m analysis. The study assessed the statistical relationship between PAX1m levels and the presence of cervical lesions, comparing the diagnostic performance of PAX1m to conventional cytology.

Results: A significant association was found between PAX1 methylation levels and the risk of CIN2 + and CIN3 + lesions, with 47 instances of CIN2 + detected. Odds ratios (ORs) for moderate and high PAX1m levels were 8.86 (95% CI: 2.24-42.17) and 166.32 (95% CI: 47.09-784.97), respectively. The area under the ROC curve for PAX1m in identifying CIN2 + lesions was 0.948 (95% CI: 0.895-0.99). PAX1m demonstrated similar sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to cytology but reduced the colposcopy referral rate from 47.7% with cytology alone to 25.6% with PAX1m, showing superior specificity and positive predictive value across age groups.

Conclusions: PAX1 methylation is a strong indicator of CIN2 + and CIN3 + risk, offering diagnostic performance comparable to cytology with the added benefit of reduced unnecessary colposcopy referrals. These findings support the use of PAX1m analysis as a reliable tool for triaging non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women in outpatient settings.

Keywords: CIN; Cervical cancer; Colposcopy referral; PAX1 methylation; hrHPV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart. Abbreviations LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; CKC, cold knife conization; CIN1, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 1; CIN2, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 2; CIN3, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 3; Ca, cervical cancer
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PAX1 methylation distribution plots and ROC curves for CIN2+/CIN3 + detection. A, Violin plots of PAX1m (ΔCp) levels grouped according to cytology results. B, Violin plots of PAX1m (ΔCp) levels grouped according to biopsy results. C, ROC curve for the PAX1m-based detection of CIN2 + lesions. D, ROC curve for the PAX1m-based detection of CIN3 + lesions. Abbreviations: NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy; ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; ASC-H, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; CIN1, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 1; CIN2, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 2; CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 2 or worse; CIN3, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 3; CIN3+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 3 or worse; Ca, cervical cancer; ROC, receiver operator characteristic curve; AUC, area of under the ROC. Statistical identification: NS., no significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. 10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Zhao Y, Dai Y, Dang L, Ma L, Yang C, Li Y, Kong L, Wei L, Zhang S, et al. Effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in China: a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(2):263–70. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6575 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chinese Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines (1). Chinese Clinical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023, Volume 24, Issue 4. July 2023:437–442.
    1. Güzel C, van Sten-Van J, de Kok I, Govorukhina NI, Boychenko A, Luider TM, Bischoff R. Molecular markers for cervical cancer screening. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2021;18(8):675–91. 10.1080/14789450.2021.1980387 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao Y, Bao H, Ma L, Song B, Di J, Wang L, Gao Y, Ren W, Wang S, Wang HJ, et al. Real-world effectiveness of primary screening with high-risk human papillomavirus testing in the cervical cancer screening programme in China: a nationwide, population-based study. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):164. 10.1186/s12916-021-02026-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances