Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 30;18(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00408-w.

Opioid exit plans for tapering postoperative pain control in noncancer patients: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Opioid exit plans for tapering postoperative pain control in noncancer patients: a systematic review

Marcel Rainer et al. Patient Saf Surg. .

Abstract

Background: A growing number of countries have reported sharp increases in the use and harm of opioid analgesics. High rates of new opioid initiation are observed in postoperative patients. In response, various tertiary care institutions have developed opioid exit plans (OEPs) to curb potential opioid-related harm.

Methods: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched to identify, summarize, and compare the interventional elements of OEPs for postoperative patient populations published from January 1, 2000, to June 4, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the articles for eligibility following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality and risk of bias. Data synthesis was performed for study characteristics, intervention details, efficacy, and development.

Results: A total of 2,585 articles were screened, eight of which met the eligibility criteria. All studies were conducted in North America and focused on orthopedic surgery patients following total hip or knee arthroplasty (n = 5) or neurosurgery (n = 3). Most studies (n = 7) included a pre-post (n = 4) or randomized clinical design (n = 3). Three studies were of good quality, and none had a low risk of bias. The interventions varied and ranged from educational sessions (n = 1) to individualized tapering protocols (n = 4) or a combination of the two (n = 2). Key elements were instructions on how to anticipate patients' postoperative need for opioid analgesics and tapering strategies based on 24-h predischarge opioid consumption. Six studies included efficacy as an endpoint in their analysis, of which four assessed statistical significance, with all four identifying that the OEPs were successful in reducing postoperative opioid use.

Conclusion: Despite differences in design and implementation, the identified OEPs suggest that they are efficacious in reducing outpatient opioid consumption. They provide a robust estimate of postoperative analgesic requirements and a rationale for tapering duration and rate. However, more rigorous studies are needed to evaluate their real-world effectiveness.

Keywords: Deprescribing; Drug safety; Hospital discharge; Noncancer pain; Opioid analgesics; Opioid tapering; Postoperative patient management; Preventive medicine; Systematic review; Transitional care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of screening and inclusion process [39, 47]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Visualization of the risk of bias assessments in the respective domains (D) [56] using the Revised Risk of Bias tool [45] for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions tool [46] for non-randomized studies (non-RCTs)

References

    1. Spencer M, Miniño A, Warner M. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 2001–2021 [Internet]. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.); 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 24]. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/122556
    1. Understanding the Opioid Overdose Epidemic [Internet]. Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 [cited 2023 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/opioids/basics/epidemic.html
    1. Gomes T, Men S, Campbell TJ, Tadrous M, Mamdani MM, Paterson JM, et al. Changing patterns of opioid initiation for pain management in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cross-sectional study. Chen RJ, editor. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0278508. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278508 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guy GP, Zhang K. Opioid prescribing by specialty and volume in the US. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):e153–5. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy B, Paulozzi L, Mack KA, Jones CM. Trends in opioid analgesic-prescribing rates by specialty, U.S., 2007–2012. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(3):409–13. 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources