Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;17(3):e12045.
doi: 10.1002/jfa2.12045.

Measuring 24-h use of time in people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer: A feasibility study

Affiliations

Measuring 24-h use of time in people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer: A feasibility study

Andrew Murphy et al. J Foot Ankle Res. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA), sleep and sedentary time are now recognised as mutually exclusive and exhaustive parts of the 24-h day-if PA decreases, time spent sleeping, being sedentary or both must increase so that all components equate to 24 h. Recent advances in time-use epidemiology suggest that we should not consider time-use domains (PA, sleep and sedentary time) in isolation from each other, but in terms of a composition-the mix of time-use domains across the 24-h day. While interrelated daily activities are known to be important in the management of diabetes mellitus, few studies have investigated the interrelated daily activities in people with an active diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) and their impact on important outcomes such as wound severity, blood glucose control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This feasibility study aims to determine the acceptability and practicality of measuring 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU and its associations on important outcome measures for this population.

Methods: Participants wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for two weeks and completed demographic and HRQoL questionnaires. Outcomes were participant engagement, reported levels of study burden and value and compositional data analysis as a methodological approach for evaluating 24-h use of time data.

Results: Twenty-six participants reported low levels of study burden and rated the study value highly. The protocol appears feasible in terms of recruitment (81%) and retention rate (86%). On average, participants were relatively sedentary spending 747, 172 and 18 min in sedentary time, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous activity, respectively. Sleep appeared adequate with participants obtaining an average of 485 min, but quality of sleep was notably poor with average sleep efficiency of 75%. Compositional data analysis was able to quantify the integrated associations of 24-h use of time with HRQoL.

Conclusion: The protocol provides an acceptable method to collect 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU. Efforts to consider and analyse PA as part of a 24-h activity composition may provide holistic and realistic understandings of PA in this clinical population.

Keywords: diabetes; diabetes mellitus; diabetes‐related foot ulcer; physical activity; sedentary behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Participant recruitment and retention flow chart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
One‐for‐remaining time reallocations for PCS‐12. LPA, light physical activity; MCS‐12, mental component score; MVPA, moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity; PCS‐12, physical component score. Coloured lines represent the model estimated change in PCS‐12, with surrounding coloured areas indicating 95% confidence intervals.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
One‐for‐remaining time reallocations for MCS‐12. LPA, light physical activity; MCS‐12, mental component score; MVPA, moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity; PCS‐12, physical component score. Coloured lines represent the model estimated change in MCS‐12, with surrounding coloured areas indicating 95% confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brownrigg, J. R. W. , Griffin M., Hughes C. O., Jones K. G., Patel N., Thompson M. M., and Hinchliffe R. J.. 2014. “Influence of Foot Ulceration on Cause‐Specific Mortality in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.” Journal of Vascular Surgery 60(4): 982–986. 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Margolis, D. J. , Kantor J., Santanna J., Strom B. L., and Berlin J. A.. 2000. “Risk Factors for Delayed Healing in Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers.” Archives of Dermatology 136(12): 1531–1535. 10.1001/archderm.136.12.1531. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jupiter, D. C. , Thorud J. C., Buckley C. J., and Shibuya N.. 2016. “The Impact of Foot Ulceration and Amputation on Mortality in Diabetic Patients. I: From Ulceration to Death, a Systematic Review.” International Wound Journal 13(5): 892–903. 10.1111/iwj.12404. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khunkaew, S. , Fernandez R., and Sim J.. 2019. “Health‐Related Quality of Life Among Adults Living with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta‐Analysis.” Quality of Life Research 28(6): 1413–1427. 10.1007/s11136-018-2082-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong, D. G. , Swerdlow M. A., Armstrong A. A., Conte M. S., Padula W. V., and Bus S. A.. 2020. “Five Year Mortality and Direct Costs of Care for People with Diabetic Foot Complications Are Comparable to Cancer.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 13(1). 10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed