Recent Advances in the Design and Application of Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Systems and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review
- PMID: 39081796
- PMCID: PMC11288362
- DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S312870
Recent Advances in the Design and Application of Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Systems and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
Purpose of review: This narrative review comprehensively aims to analyze recent advancements in shoulder arthroplasty, focusing on implant systems and their impact on patient outcomes. The purpose is to provide a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape in shoulder arthroplasty, incorporating scientific, regulatory, and ethical dimensions.
Recent findings: The review synthesizes recent literature on stemless implants, augmented glenoid components, inlay vs onlay configurations, convertible stems, and associated complications. Notable findings include improved patient-reported outcomes with stemless implants, variations in outcomes between inlay and onlay configurations, and the potential advantages of convertible stems. Additionally, the regulatory landscape, particularly the FDA's 510(k) pathway, is explored alongside ethical considerations, emphasizing the need for standardized international regulations.
Summary: Recent innovations in shoulder arthroplasty showcase promising advancements, with stemless implants demonstrating improved patient outcomes. The review underscores the necessity for ongoing research to address unresolved aspects and highlights the importance of a standardized regulatory framework to ensure patient safety globally. The synthesis of recent findings contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the current state of shoulder arthroplasty, guiding future research and clinical practices.
Keywords: glenoid components; innovations in arthroplasty; patient outcomes; rTSA; shoulder arthroplasty; stemless implants.
© 2024 Twomey-Kozak et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Christopher Klifto is a consultant for Smith and Nephew. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Stemless shoulder arthroplasty.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Feb;109(1S):103460. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103460. Epub 2022 Oct 29. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36942793 Review.
-
Convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Oct 17;4(3):594-599. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.010. eCollection 2024 Aug. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023. PMID: 39157239 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Innovations in Shoulder Arthroplasty.J Clin Med. 2022 May 16;11(10):2799. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102799. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35628933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of Stemless Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Indications, Outcomes, and Future Prospects.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 28;13(13):3813. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133813. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38999379 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Future Frontiers in Shoulder Arthroplasty and the Management of Shoulder Osteoarthritis.Clin Sports Med. 2018 Oct;37(4):609-630. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2018.05.009. Clin Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 30201174 Review.
Cited by
-
Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 24;18:3117-3139. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S521788. eCollection 2025. J Pain Res. 2025. PMID: 40590046 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lugli T. Artificial shoulder joint by Péan (1893): the facts of an exceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop. 1978;133:215–218. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials