Telehealth Utilization in Neuro-Oncology: Commentary on a Single Institution Experience After the COVID-19 Pandemic
- PMID: 39083169
- DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01588-5
Telehealth Utilization in Neuro-Oncology: Commentary on a Single Institution Experience After the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and reimbursement policy changes provided patients improved access to neuro-oncology by telehealth. Here we discuss benefits and limitations of telehealth use in neuro-oncology. We review utilization of telemedicine services following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Recent findings: Utilization of telemedicine by neuro-oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic was 52%, compared to 27-29% for other solid tumors groups. Following the pandemic, between January 2021 and April 2024, telehealth utilization has remained high in neuro-oncology with approximately 30% of all visits completed by telemedicine, compared to 10-15% for other solid tumor groups. The striking difference between telehealth visit utilization in neuro-oncology and general medical oncology even after expiration of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency expiration and end of pandemic-related restrictions, underscores the potential value of convenient access to care for patients with central nervous system tumors. Given widespread use of telehealth in neuro-oncology, prospective evaluation to determine the safety, usability, and acceptance of video-enabled, telehealth visits is critical. Such data may lead to broader adoption of telehealth, lead to regulatory and reimbursement reform for telehealth sustainability, and improve clinical trial access and accruals.
Keywords: COVID-19; Digital health; Glioma; Healthcare delivery; Neuro-oncology; Telehealth.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing Interests: Joshua Pritchett has nothing to disclose. Joon Uhm has nothing to disclose. Ugur Sener has served on an advisory board for Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC; unrelated to this work. Tufa Haddad has received research grant funding from Takeda Oncology (Institutional) and served on an advisory board for Puma Biotechnology (no personal compensation); both are unrelated to this work. Conflict of Interest: Joshua Pritchett has nothing to disclose. Joon Uhm has nothing to disclose. Ugur Sener has served on an advisory board for Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC; unrelated to this work. Tufa Haddad has received research grant funding from Takeda Oncology (Institutional) and served on an advisory board for Puma Biotechnology (no personal compensation); both are unrelated to this work.
Similar articles
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Utilization in a Large Integrated Health Care System: Retrospective Cohort Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 29;23(4):e26558. doi: 10.2196/26558. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33882020 Free PMC article.
-
Tele-neuro-oncology: Current Practices and Future Directions.Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Jan;24(1):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01176-x. Epub 2022 Jan 20. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35059995 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medical Oncology Professionals' Perceptions of Telehealth Video Visits.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33967. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33443581 Free PMC article.
-
Tele-Neuro-Ophthalmology: Vision for 20/20 and Beyond.J Neuroophthalmol. 2020 Sep;40(3):378-384. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001038. J Neuroophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32604247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 Pandemic Influence on Medical Oncology Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Video Visits.JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):e610-e619. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00473. Epub 2021 Oct 22. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022. PMID: 34678074 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Telemedicine Trends in Ambulatory Surgical Oncology: A Five-Year Analysis of Visit Volume and Utilization at a High-Volume Academic Center.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep;32(9):6829-6837. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17592-3. Epub 2025 Jun 11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40498347
References
-
- Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016–2020. Neuro Oncol 2023;25(Supplement_4):iv1-iv99. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad149 .
-
- M IJ-K, Snijders TJ, de Graeff A, Teunissen S, de Vos FYF. Prevalence of symptoms in glioma patients throughout the disease trajectory: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2018;140(3):485–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03015-9 .
-
- Rottgering JG, Belgers V, Kouwenhoven MCM, et al. Frequency and burden of potentially treatable symptoms in glioma patients with stable disease. Heliyon. 2023;9(2):e13278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13278 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Boele FW, Meads D, Jansen F, et al. Healthcare utilization and productivity loss in glioma patients and family caregivers: the impact of treatable psychological symptoms. J Neurooncol. 2020;147(2):485–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03454-3 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Haider SA, Asmaro K, Kalkanis SN, et al. The economic impact of glioma survivorship: The cost of care from a patient perspective. Neurology. 2020;95(11):e1575–81. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010263 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous