Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 31;409(1):235.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03429-2.

Adult intussusception: a systematic review of current literature

Affiliations

Adult intussusception: a systematic review of current literature

Jithin T Chand et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Intussusception in adults is a rare condition characterized by a low incidence, which complicates the establishment of standardized management protocols unlike those readily available for pediatric cases. This study presents a case series from our institution alongside a systematic review of existing literature. The objective is to delineate effective management strategies for adult intussusception.

Methods: A systematic search of databases was conducted covering the period from January 2000 to May 2024. The study focused on adult patients diagnosed with intussusception either pre-operatively or intraoperatively and managed with either surgical intervention or conservative methods. The analysis also included retrospective review of patient records from our institution, specifically targeting individuals over 18 years of age, to determine the predominant types of intussusception and identify any pathological lead points associated with these cases.

Results: In our study, a total of 1,902 patients were included from 59 selected articles, with a mean age of 52.13 ± 14.95 years. Among them, 1,920 intussusceptions were diagnosed, with 98.3% of cases identified preoperatively. Computed tomography (CT) scan was the primary diagnostic modality used in 88.5% of cases. Abdominal pain was the predominant presenting symptom, observed in 86.23% of cases. Only 29 out of 1,920 cases underwent attempted reduction, while the majority required surgical resection due to the high incidence of malignancy in adult cases. The most common type of intussusception identified was colocolic (16.82%), followed by enteric (13.28%), ileocolic (4.89%), and ileocaecal (0.78%) types. A pathological lead point was observed in 302 out of 673 patients (44.84%), with a notably higher frequency of malignancy associated with colocolic intussusception.

Conclusion: Surgical management remains the cornerstone in treating adult intussusception, particularly in cases involving the colocolic type, where there is a significant risk of underlying malignancy. Attempts at reduction are generally avoided due to the potential risk of tumor dissemination, which could adversely impact patient outcomes. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen is pivotal for accurately diagnosing intussusceptions and guiding appropriate management strategies. It is imperative to adhere strictly to oncological principles during surgical interventions to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes.

Keywords: Adult intussusception; Colocolic intussusception; Enteric intussusception; Intestinal obstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Boyack I, Vu D, Patel P, Opsha O (2020Aug) Colocolic intussusception secondary to submucosal lipoma. Am J Emerg Med 38(8):1697.e1-1697.e3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poudel D, Lamichhane SR, Ajay KC, Maharjan N (2022) Colocolic intussusception secondary to colonic adenocarcinoma with impending caecal perforation in an elderly patient: a rare case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 94:107093 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zubaidi A, Al-Saif F, Silverman R (2006) Adult intussusception: a retrospective review. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1546–1551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahn JH, Choi SC, Lee KJ, Jung YS (2009) A clinical overview of a retrospective study about adult intussusceptions: focusing on discrepancies among previous studies. Dig Dis Sci 54(12):2643–2649 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 29:n71 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources