ESR Essentials: diagnostic work-up in patients with symptomatic breast disease-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging
- PMID: 39085641
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10980-5
ESR Essentials: diagnostic work-up in patients with symptomatic breast disease-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging
Abstract
Breast complaints are frequent reasons for consultations in primary care or breast clinics. Breast pain, breast lumps, and nipple discharge are the most common complaints. Less common symptoms such as skin changes and axillary abnormalities also require specific diagnostic approaches. Imaging the symptomatic breast should be performed by appropriately trained breast radiologists following the best practice guidelines and quality standards. Full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and breast ultrasound (US) are the main modalities used in this primary setting. The choice depends on the patient's age and symptoms. Women younger than 30-years-old are first imaged by US, whereas women over 40-years-old usually require both FFDM or DBT and US. For women between 30-years-old and 40-years-old, the US is the modality of choice, whereas FFDM or DBT might also be performed if needed. Pregnant or lactating women with palpable lesions or nipple discharge are imaged with US as the first method; FFDM or DBT can also be performed depending on the degree of suspicion as the dose to the fetus is minimal, and shielding may even further reduce the dose. More advanced techniques such as breast magnetic resonance imaging or contrast-enhanced mammography are not indicated in this first diagnostic setting and are reserved for cases of established malignancy (local staging) or rare cases of equivocal findings not otherwise resolved or inflammatory breast cancer. Last, but not least, male breast symptoms should also be addressed with US and/or FFDM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: It is equally important to correctly diagnose an underlying malignancy and to avoid false positives that would lead to unnecessary biopsies, increased costs, and anxiety for the patient. Proper use of imaging modalities ensures optimal diagnostic approach and minimizes false negatives. KEY POINTS: Ultrasound, full-field digital mammography, or digital breast tomosynthesis are the main imaging modalities in the diagnostic setting, while MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography should be reserved to selected cases. Initial imaging modality includes ultrasound combined with mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis depending on women's age and the presence (or not) of inconclusive findings. A negative imaging evaluation should not deter biopsy when a highly suspicious finding is found on physical examination.
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Nipple discharge; Ultrasonography.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Ritse Mann. Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: F.J.G. is supported by NIHR Cambridge BRC Ritse Mann is a member of the European Radiology Editorial Board. He has not taken part in the review or selection process of this article. Statistics and biometry: No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Informed consent: Written informed consent was not required. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was not required. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: Not applicable. Methodology: Practice recommendations
References
-
- Salzman B, Fleegle S, Tully AS (2012) Common breast problems. Am Fam Physician 86:343–349 - PubMed
-
- Huggenberger IK, Andersen JS (2015) Predictive value of the official cancer alarm symptoms in general practice-a systematic review. Dan Med J 62:A5034 - PubMed
-
- Newell MS (2023) The power of the probe: targeted US alone for evaluation of breast symptoms. Radiology 307:e230418 - PubMed
-
- Al Nemer A, Kussaibi H (2020) The accuracy of nipple discharge cytology in detecting breast cancer. Diagnosis 8:269–273 - PubMed
-
- Barsic Ostojic S, Grbanovic L, Tonklin A, Kovacevic L, Marusic Z, Prutki M (2022) Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis in female patients with nipple discharge. Cancer Rep 5:e1602
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
