Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 1;30(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00280-x.

Blood pressure control in diabetic kidney disease: a post-hoc analysis of the FANTASTIC trial

Affiliations

Blood pressure control in diabetic kidney disease: a post-hoc analysis of the FANTASTIC trial

Cheol Ho Park et al. Clin Hypertens. .

Abstract

Background: The target blood pressure (BP) value is unclear for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of strict BP control or 'on treatment' BP on clinical outcomes in patients with DKD.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the prespecified secondary outcomes of the FimAsartaN proTeinuriA SusTaIned reduCtion in comparison with losartan in diabetic chronic kidney disease (FANTASTIC) trial, a randomized multicenter double-blind phase III trial. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 19 years with DKD. We assigned 341 participants with DKD to BP control strategy (standard-systolic BP [SBP] < 140 mmHg versus strict-SBP < 130 mmHg). The outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events and renal events. Separate analyses were performed to compared the risk of outcome according to achieved average BP levels.

Results: A total of 341 participants were included in the analysis. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, cardiovascular/renal events were observed in 25 (7.3%) participants. Mean (SD) SBPs in the standard and strict BP control group were 140.2 (11.6) and 140.2 (11.9) mmHg, respectively. The strict BP control group did not show significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.60-2.92]). In the post-hoc analyses using achieved BP, achieved average SBP of 130-139 mmHg resulted in reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.67) compared to achieved average SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, whereas further reduction in achieved average SBP < 130 mmHg did not impart additional benefits.

Conclusion: In patients with DKD, targeting a SBP of less than 130 mmHg, as compared with less than 140 mmHg, did not reduce the rate of a composite of cardiovascular and renal events. Achieved SBP of 130-139 mmHg was associated with a decreased risk for the primary outcome in patients with DKD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTirals.gov Identifier: NCT02620306, registered December 3, 2015. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02620306 ).

Keywords: Blood pressure; Cardiovascular outcome; Diabetic kidney disease; Kidney outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.P. received lecture fees from Boryoung, Hanmi, Daewoong, Donga, Celltrion, Servier, Daiichi Sankyo and Daewon. S.P. also received research grant from Daiichi Sankyo. Y.J.K. received consultation fee from Celltrion and received lecture fees from Yuhan, Daewoong, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Takeda, and GC pharma. S.J.H. received lecture fees and research sponsoring from Hanmi, InnoN, Samjin and Boryung. S.G.K. received lecture fees and research sponsoring from Yuhan, JW Pharma, AstraZeneca, GSK, Fibrogen, Akebia, Omeros, Chinook, MorphoSys, Otsuka and Boryung. J.C.W. received lecture fees and research sponsoring from Chong Kun Dang, Daewoong, Eli Lilly, Yuhan and Boryung.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow of the study. Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Systolic blood pressure in the two treatment groups over the course of the trial. The SBP target in the standard BP control group was less than 140 mmHg and the target in the strict BP control group was less than 130 mmHg. Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for the outcomes according to the achieved average SBP categories. Kaplan–Meier curves for cardiovascular and renal outcomes (A), cardiovascular outcome (B), and renal outcome (C). Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure

Similar articles

References

    1. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, Rocco MV, et al. A Randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheung AK, Rahman M, Reboussin DM, Craven TE, Greene T, Kimmel PL, et al. Effects of intensive BP control in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(9):2812–23. 10.1681/ASN.2017020148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Blood Pressure Working Group. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2021;99(3S):S1–87. - PubMed
    1. Mann JFE, Chang TI, Cushman WC, Furth SL, Ix JH, Hou FF, et al. Commentary on the KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in CKD. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021;23(9):132. 10.1007/s11886-021-01559-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carriazo S, Sarafidis P, Ferro CJ, Ortiz A. Blood pressure targets in CKD 2021: the never-ending guidelines debacle. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15(5):845–51. 10.1093/ckj/sfac014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources