Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug 1;31(4):e0979.
doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000979. eCollection 2024 Oct 1.

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Yield of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Using Three Different Techniques in Patients Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy (BAL-3T)

Inderpaul Singh Sehgal  1 , Gurkirat Kaur  1 , Nalini Gupta  2 , Sahajal Dhooria  1 , Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad  1 , Amanjit Bal  3 , Parikshaa Gupta  2 , Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal  1 , Valliappan Muthu  1 , Ritesh Agarwal  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Yield of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Using Three Different Techniques in Patients Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy (BAL-3T)

Inderpaul Singh Sehgal et al. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. .

Abstract

Background: Three techniques have been described for aspirating the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, namely the wall mount suction (WMS), manual suction (MS), and manual suction with tubing (MST). However, there is no direct comparison among the 3 methods.

Methods: We randomized patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy and BAL in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the 3 arms. The primary outcome was to compare the optimal yield, defined as at least 30% return of volume instilled and <5% bronchial cells. The key secondary outcomes were the percentage of volume and total amount (in millimeters) return of BAL, as well as complications (hypoxemia, airway bleeding, and others).

Results: We randomized 942 patients [MST (n = 314), MS (n = 314), WMS (n = 314)]. The mean age of the study population [58.7% (n = 553) males] was 46.9 years. The most common indication for BAL was suspected pulmonary infection. Right upper lobes and middle lobes were the commonest sampled lobes. The optimal yield was similar in all the groups [MST (35.6%) vs MS (42.2%) vs WMS (36.5%); P = 0.27]. A significantly higher proportion of patients had BALF return >30% (P = 0.005) in the WMS (54.2%) and MS (54%) than in the MST arm (42.9%). The absolute and the percentage volume of BALF was also higher in WMS and MS than in the MST arm. There was no difference in the complication rate or other secondary outcomes across the groups.

Conclusion: We found no difference in the optimal yield of BAL or complications using any one of the 3 methods for BAL fluid retrieval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: There is no conflict of interest or other disclosures.

References

    1. Mohan A, Madan K, Hadda V, et al. Guidelines for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: Joint Indian Chest Society/National College of CHEST PHYSICIAns (I)/Indian Association for Bronchology Recommendations. Lung India. 2019;36(Supplement)):S37–s89.
    1. Zhang W, Huang Y, Helmers R. Bronchoalveolar lavage In: KP Wang, AC Mehta, JF Turner, eds Flexible Bronchoscopy 4th ed. 2020: 185–206.
    1. Baughman RP. Technical aspects of bronchoalveolar lavage: recommendations for a standard procedure. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;28:475–485.
    1. Collins AM, Rylance J, Wootton DG, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for research; obtaining adequate sample yield. J Vis Exp. 2014:4345.
    1. Meyer KC. Bronchoalveolar lavage as a diagnostic tool. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;28:546–560.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources