Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 30;8(3):179-187.
doi: 10.23922/jarc.2023-061. eCollection 2024.

Comparison of the Fecal Incontinence Severity Scores between Self-administration by Patients and an Oral Interview by a Physician

Akira Tsunoda  1 , Hiroshi Kusanagi  1
Affiliations

Comparison of the Fecal Incontinence Severity Scores between Self-administration by Patients and an Oral Interview by a Physician

Akira Tsunoda et al. J Anus Rectum Colon. .

Abstract

Objectives: To compare patients' self-administered responses to the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) questionnaire (A1) with their responses to physician's oral interview (A3).

Methods: Patients (n=100: mean age: 72 years; 66 women) with FI completed the FISI and the modified FISI (with written explanations) questionnaires, followed by a physician interview. To identify a threshold for the rating gap between A1 and A3, we calculated each patient's mean difference in the FISI scores.

Results: There was no significant difference in the FISI scores between A1 and A3. A rating gap existed in the FISI scores (mean difference=8.9). It occurred in 37% of the patients, making its threshold 9. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age and no history of pelvic floor surgery were independently associated with the presence of a rating gap in the FISI scores. The in-coincidence of ticked boxes to all types of leakage between the self-administered responses and those by physician's oral history was 49% (197/400). Older age was associated with the in-coincidence of a ticked box between the assessment results of gas or solid stool leakage.

Conclusions: Some non-negligible discrepancy existed between patients' self-administered responses and their responses to physician's oral interview, especially in older patients.

Keywords: fecal incontinence; patient's self-administered responses; responses of patients by physician's oral interview.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean difference between the FISI scores based on self-administration by patients and based on oral interview by a physician. FISI, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index; bar, standard error. Mean value is 8.9 (standard error 0.94).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of patients based on the difference between the FISI scores obtained by self-administration by patients and the responses of patients by physician’s oral interview. FISI, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index; a, A total of 37 patients who showed a rating gap (≥9) in the FISI scores.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bliss DZ, Fischer LR, Savik K, et al. Severity of fecal incontinence in community-living elderly in a health maintenance organization. Res Nurs Health. 2004 Jun; 27(3): 162-73. - PubMed
    1. Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Naramura H, et al. Urinary and fecal incontinence in a community-residing older population in Japan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Feb; 45(2): 215-9. - PubMed
    1. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Dec; 42(12): 1525-32. - PubMed
    1. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan; 36(1): 77-97. - PubMed
    1. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, et al. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999 Jan; 44(1): 77-80. - PMC - PubMed