Role of Sticky Bone in the Management of Various Alveolar Bone Defects: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39087152
- PMCID: PMC11290384
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63561
Role of Sticky Bone in the Management of Various Alveolar Bone Defects: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Aim: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of sticky bone in managing various alveolar bone defects, examining both its benefits and drawbacks.
Materials and methods: The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and employed a thorough search strategy using major databases, medical subject headings (MeSH) keywords, and Boolean operators. As a result, the systematic review identified 12 studies focusing on the efficacy of sticky bone in treating alveolar bone defects. Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials and case series reporting on the outcomes of sticky bone use for bone defect treatment. Two examiners meticulously performed screening, data extraction, and bias assessment, with the risk of bias evaluated using the Cochrane tool.
Result: The findings indicated significant improvements in bone quality, width, height, and volume, with enhanced predictability in socket preservation and implant placement. Sticky bone was particularly effective in ridge augmentation, guided bone regeneration, and filling periodontal defects, often outperforming alternatives like concentrated growth factors (CGFs) and autologous fibrin glue (AFG). It simplified procedures and reduced resorption during healing, underscoring its value as a versatile adjunct in bone reconstruction surgery.
Conclusion: Sticky bone demonstrated exceptional results in various oral surgeries, effectively addressing issues such as furcation defects, bone loss, and ridge augmentation, with significant clinical and radiographic improvements. Further research is needed to explore its full potential and refine protocols for broader oral surgery and periodontics applications.
Keywords: alveolar bone defects; bone graft; growth factors; oral surgery; regenerative material; ridge augmentation; sticky bone; systematic review.
Copyright © 2024, Sareen et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Comparison between PRP, PRGF and PRF: lights and shadows in three similar but different protocols. Giannini S, Cielo A, Bonanome L, Rastelli C, Derla C, Corpaci F, Falisi G. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25855914/ Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19:927–930. - PubMed
-
- Platelet rich fibrin - a second regeneration platelet concentrate and advances in PRF. Kumar AP, Reddy GV, Babu PR, Reddy GJ. Indian J Dent Adv. 2015;7:251–254.
-
- Platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin in human cell culture. Gassling VL, Açil Y, Springer IN, Hubert N, Wiltfang J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.007. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:48–55. - PubMed
-
- Bioactive platelet aggregates: Prp, Prgf, Prf, Cgf and sticky bone. Upadhayaya V, Aman A, Goyal A. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2017;16:5–11.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials