Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug;50(8):1298-1309.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07545-x. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

Prolonged vs shorter awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prolonged vs shorter awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomised controlled trial

Ling Liu et al. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Awake prone positioning has been reported to reduce endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, it is still unclear whether using the awake prone positioning for longer periods can further improve outcomes.

Methods: In this randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at 12 hospitals in China, non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related AHRF were randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (target > 12 h daily for 7 days) or standard care with a shorter period of awake prone positioning. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 28 days after randomization. The key secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events.

Results: In total, 409 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (n = 205) or standard care (n = 204). In the first 7 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 12 h/d (interquartile range [IQR] 12-14 h/d) in the prolonged awake prone positioning group vs. 5 h/d (IQR 2-8 h/d) in the standard care group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, intubation occurred in 35 (17%) patients assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning and in 56 (27%) patients assigned to standard care (relative risk 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.9]). The hazard ratio (HR) for intubation was 0.56 (0.37-0.86), and for mortality was 0.63 (0.42-0.96) for prolonged awake prone positioning versus standard care, within 28 days. The incidence of pre-specified adverse events was low and similar in both groups.

Conclusion: Prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF reduces the intubation rate without significant harm. These results support prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05677984.

Keywords: COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure; Intubation; Mortality; Prolonged awake prone positioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening, enrolment, randomization, and follow-up of trial participants. BMI body-mass index, NYHA New York holstein association, CPAP Continuous positive airway pressure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Duration of Awake Prone Positioning and Kaplan–Meier probabilities estimates in the intention-to-treat population. A The box plots display the median durations of prone positioning. The lines represent the median, the box edges represent the first and third quartiles, the whiskers represent the most extreme values up to 1.5 × IQR, and the dots represent the more extreme values. B Probability of endotracheal intubation*. The log-rank test demonstrated a significant between-group difference (P = 0.0092). *Patients who refused intubation after randomization were included as NOT being intubated. C Probability of death. The log-rank test demonstrated a significant between-group difference (P = 0.045)

References

    1. Bryan AC (1974) Conference on the scientific basis of respiratory therapy. Pulmonary physiotherapy in the pediatric age group. Comments of a devil’s advocate. Am Rev Respir Dis 110:143–144. 10.1164/arrd.1974.110.6P2.143 10.1164/arrd.1974.110.6P2.143 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC et al (2013) Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 368(23):2159–2168. 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guérin C, Albert RK, Beitler J et al (2020) Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom. Intensive Care Med 46(12):2385–2396. 10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w 10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gorman EA, O’Kane CM, McAuley DF (2022) Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management. Lancet 400(10358):1157–1170. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01439-8 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01439-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berlin DA, Gulick RM, Martinez FJ (2020) Severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 383(25):2451–2460. 10.1056/NEJMcp2009575 10.1056/NEJMcp2009575 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data