Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):e3034.
doi: 10.1002/cpp.3034.

Comparing in Person to Telehealth Delivery of a Family Violence Intervention

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing in Person to Telehealth Delivery of a Family Violence Intervention

Carla Smith Stover et al. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that therapy and intervention services delivered by telehealth are effective at reducing a variety of mental health symptoms. Limited studies have indicated online services can reduce intimate partner violence (IPV), but none have tested in-person compared to telehealth-delivered interventions for men who have used IPV. Clinical outcome data from 311 parents (192 fathers and 119 linked coparent mothers) engaged in the Fathers for Change (F4C) intervention following referral by child protective services for IPV were examined to determine if in-person delivery of the intervention differed in terms of client treatment engagement and retention or outcomes. Parents who enrolled during a 1-year period prior to the COVID pandemic received their F4C therapy in person, while those who enrolled during the pandemic received their intake and most of their sessions via telehealth delivery. Parents reported significantly greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress prior to treatment if they enrolled prior to COVID than if they enrolled during the pandemic. There were few differences in completion rates or outcomes based on in-person compared to telehealth delivery. Fathers were slightly more likely to complete treatment and attended a significantly higher percentage of their sessions when it was delivered by telehealth during COVID. Fathers reported significantly lower stress scores posttreatment when they received COVID telehealth delivery compared to prior to COVID in-person delivery of F4C. These findings suggest that telehealth may be an appropriate and viable option for the delivery of IPV interventions for families.

Keywords: intimate partner violence; telehealth; treatment outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aboujaoude, E., W. Salame, and L. Naim. 2015. “Telemental Health: A Status Update.” World Psychiatry 14, no. 2: 223–230.
    1. Assari, S., and R. D. Jeremiah. 2018. “Intimate Partner Violence May Be One Mechanism by Which Male Partner Socioeconomic Status and Substance Use Affect Female Partner Health.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9: 160.
    1. Beebe, R., M. C. Fish, D. Grasso, B. Bernstein, S. DiVietro, and C. S. Stover. 2023. “Reducing Family Violence Through Child Welfare Intervention: A Propensity Score‐Matched Study of Fathers for Change.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38, no. 21–22: 11666–11691.
    1. Braithwaite, S. R., and F. D. Fincham. 2009. “A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Computer Based Preventive Intervention: Replication and Extension of ePREP.” Journal of Family Psychology 23: 32–38.
    1. Breiding, M. J., S. G. Smith, K. C. Basile, M. L. Walters, J. Chen, and M. T. Merrick. 2014. “Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization‐‐National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, d.c.: 2002) 63: 1–18.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources