Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;17(6):1328-1337.
doi: 10.1007/s12265-024-10550-6. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

Force Analysis Using Self-Expandable Valve Fluoroscopic Imaging: a way Through Artificial Intelligence

Affiliations

Force Analysis Using Self-Expandable Valve Fluoroscopic Imaging: a way Through Artificial Intelligence

Yiming Qi et al. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a force analysis model correlating fluoroscopic images of self-expandable valves with stress distribution. For this purpose, a nonmetallic measuring device designed to apply diverse forces at specific positions on a valve stent while simultaneously measuring force magnitude was manufactured, obtaining 465 sets of fluorescent films under different force conditions, resulting in 5580 images and their corresponding force tables. Using the XrayGLM, a mechanical analysis model based on valve fluorescence images was trained. The accuracy of the image force analysis using this model was approximately 70% (50-88.3%), with a relative accuracy of 93.3% (75-100%). This confirms that fluoroscopic images of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) valve stents contain a wealth of mechanical information, and machine learning can be used to train models to recognize the relationship between stent images and force distribution, enhancing the understanding of TAVR complications.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Fluoroscopy image; Mechanical distribution; Self-expandable valve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Sammour Y, Krishnaswamy A, Kumar A, Puri R, Tarakji KG, Bazarbashi N, Harb S, Griffin B, Svensson L, Wazni O, Kapadia SR. Incidence, predictors, and implications of permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:115–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.063 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auffret V, Puri R, Urena M, Chamandi C, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Philippon F, Rodes-Cabau J. Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current status and future perspectives. Circulation. 2017;136:1049–69. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028352 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ovcharenko EA, Klyshnikov KU, Vlad AR, Sizova IN, Kokov AN, Nushtaev DV, Yuzhalin AE, Zhuravleva IU. Computer-aided design of the human aortic root. Comput Biol Med. 2014;54:109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.023 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baillargeon B, Rebelo N, Fox DD, Taylor RL, Kuhl E. The living heart project: a robust and integrative simulator for human heart function. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2014;48:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.04.001 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Morganti S, Conti M, Aiello M, Valentini A, Mazzola A, Reali A, Auricchio F. Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation through patient-specific finite element analysis: two clinical cases. J Biomech. 2014;47:2547–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.007 . - DOI - PubMed