Timbral brightness perception investigated through multimodal interference
- PMID: 39090510
- PMCID: PMC11410849
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02934-2
Timbral brightness perception investigated through multimodal interference
Abstract
Brightness is among the most studied aspects of timbre perception. Psychoacoustically, sounds described as "bright" versus "dark" typically exhibit a high versus low frequency emphasis in the spectrum. However, relatively little is known about the neurocognitive mechanisms that facilitate these metaphors we listen with. Do they originate in universal magnitude representations common to more than one sensory modality? Triangulating three different interaction paradigms, we investigated using speeded classification whether intramodal, crossmodal, and amodal interference occurs when timbral brightness, as modeled by the centroid of the spectral envelope, and pitch height/visual brightness/numerical value processing are semantically congruent and incongruent. In four online experiments varying in priming strategy, onset timing, and response deadline, 189 total participants were presented with a baseline stimulus (a pitch, gray square, or numeral) then asked to quickly identify a target stimulus that is higher/lower, brighter/darker, or greater/less than the baseline after being primed with a bright or dark synthetic harmonic tone. Results suggest that timbral brightness modulates the perception of pitch and possibly visual brightness, but not numerical value. Semantically incongruent pitch height-timbral brightness shifts produced significantly slower reaction time (RT) and higher error compared to congruent pairs. In the visual task, incongruent pairings of gray squares and tones elicited slower RTs than congruent pairings (in two experiments). No interference was observed in the number comparison task. These findings shed light on the embodied and multimodal nature of experiencing timbre.
Keywords: Auditory brightness; Crossmodal correspondences; Stroop interference; Timbre; Visual brightness.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Aizenman, A. M., Gold, J. M., & Sekuler, R. (2018). Multisensory integration in short-term memory: Musicians do rock. Neuroscience,389, 141–151. - PubMed
-
- Arieh, Y., & Marks, L. E. (2008). Cross-modal interaction between vision and hearing: A speed-accuracy analysis. Perception and Psychophysics,70(3), 412–421. - PubMed
-
- Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,67(1), 1–48.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources